Why are you pretending that it is news that the Fifth Estate did a report on AARC, when every single poster on here is well aware of that fact?
Why can't you address the fact that the staff at AARC are performing an illegal act when they perform the Restricted Activity outlined in the prior post?
Why can't you address the fact that it is not legal for AARC to hold their clients against their will without a court order, yet they do?
Why can't you address the fact that even under PCHAD the kid cannot be held longer than five days, must have access to a lawyer, and must be made aware of their release date, none of which AARC abides by?
Stating that AARC must be legal because nobody is shutting it down is so childishly illogical as to defy understanding in any milieu outside of either a group of mentally handicapped people or as part of some bizarre game.
As an infinite number of possible reasons for AARC not being closed exist, it is tremendously fatuous to claim that if they were doing "even the least bit thing not by the books it would have been uncovered".
That statement is so inane, I am not quite sure how to respond to it.
Whose microscope has AARC been under? The Health Minister is not investigating AARC. The Justice Minister is not. The Children's Services Minister is not, and neither are the Calgary Police Service.
Are you then referring to me? You must be, since nobody else is seriously undertaking an analysis of the program, and I have pointed out three illegal elements of the program in this post alone.
Lie after lie is piled on. "The AARColytes aren't trying to discredit the people speak out against AARC." Yes, they are, as demonstrated over and over again on a number of websites.
"Vause doesn't need any academic qualifications nor a license to do what he does." Yes, he does, as spelled out quite plainly in the Alberat Health Professions Act.
"AARC has all the required licenses". No, the treatment cetntre has no license at all, nor does the staff providing treatment.
As soon as you're caught in a lie, you simply change the subject, as has been the case since this forum was created.
Did any of you AARColytes ever manage to clearly refute a single thing brought up against AARC, ever?
It is embarassing to think of AARColytes as fellow human beings. How many posts on the CBC website contained AARColyte claims that the Fifth Estate report contained lies, and yet not a single instance of a lie was ever demonstrated by any AARColytes. A few AARColytes lied about the interviewees, but no one could dispute that the Wiz copied the program from Kids, no one could dispute that the host homes are dangerous, no one could dispute that the Wiz was an employee of a disgraceful rip-off abuse factory. So what were the lies the CBC told?
Again, no AARColytes can provide anything to substantiate their claims, so they jump to something else, make an emotional outburst with no basis in fact or reason and then resort to the tried and true AARC method of threats.
How's that investigation into internet threats going? How about the "lawsuit packages" the girls were getting two months ago? How about the police "slander" investigation?
The only response you people have is to send your mouth-breathing political hacks into the Legislature, where instead of answering questions about AARC, they respond with "how many people has AARC helped?", as though that vague and unaswerable question mitigates the fact that AARC is an outlaw totalist socio-religious organization.
