We're not getting any place. Why you have attempted to take a paternalistic tone, explaining to me you particular view of the relationship between the media and politicians, is baffling. It is counterintuitive for you to assume a pedagogic role, when you're clearly not familiar with any of the particulars of this phenomenon. Again, beggin the question, what exactly is wrong with you. Your vanity aside, the thread concerned AARC's attempt to remedy their twenty years of medical malpractise, not your completely mistaken perception of AARC as a business. Neither was the thread concerned with your compulsion to assume the role of authority figure, dispensing wisdom. Your egocentism is boring. Since you're posting on this forum, one would assume that you are familiar with Straight and Kids. If you're familiar with Straight and Kids, yet you are alleging that I have falsely made claims about AARC that are identical to those made, and after many years proven, about Straight and Kids, then you obviously don't know anything about AARC. If you don't know anything about AARC, yet you fabricate scenarios in which you make assumptions about me, AARC, and government officials in Alberta, and you feel that others are interested in reading these scenarios, then it would seem that you're just lonely and desperate for attention. If however, you do know the details about AARC's employees, and it's status vis-a-vis the Government of Alberta, yet you still allege that I'm lying, then you are attempting to defend criminals who routinely violate the basic human rights of people who are helpless to defend themselves.
So which is it fucker, are you just a lonely nut-case, or are you a truly deviant fan of child abuse?