Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Troubled Teen Industry.com - Program Website Division
Troubled-Teen-Industry.com News
Che Gookin:
We work with you don't we?
Deprogrammed:
--- Quote from: "Che Gookin" ---We work with you don't we?
--- End quote ---
and your point is what?
Che Gookin:
My point is simple.
Everyone, despite their past and what we think they might do or what we think of them, will be given a chance. The burden of responsibility if on our shoulders for not worrying about their antics when they fly off the pump handle and handling ourselves accordingly and rising above the name calling and other bullshit. Likewise, the need for avoiding the tired old, "I told you so" arguments as well. The only disqualification is if they are currently referring or start referring in the future and if they are Sue Scheff/Dizzy Izzy/Lon Phoolsbury/and the obvious and not so obvious program villians.
Other than that.. everyone gets an equal chance..
The primary reasoning for this is simple:
1) Sue is a fucking whore so I doubt anyone in their right minds would work with that bitch.
2) Everyone else has something about them that someone else despises and if that was taken into consideration we'd all be still trolling Open Free for all for goatse porn.
3) This project is not exclusionary due to past forum hijinks and if it ever becomes so the project immediately will have earned a new critic, mainly me.
4)This project is about getting over past bullshit and growing up.
Giving Kevin a chance was about either allowing him to grow up or allowing him to make a fool out of himself. That is his responsibility and his alone.
That's my point.
Deprogrammed:
--- Quote from: "Che Gookin" ---My point is simple.
Everyone, despite their past and what we think they might do or what we think of them, will be given a chance. The burden of responsibility if on our shoulders for not worrying about their antics when they fly off the pump handle and handling ourselves accordingly and rising above the name calling and other bullshit. Likewise, the need for avoiding the tired old, "I told you so" arguments as well. The only disqualification is if they are currently referring or start referring in the future and if they are Sue Scheff/Dizzy Izzy/Lon Phoolsbury/and the obvious and not so obvious program villians.
Other than that.. everyone gets an equal chance..
The primary reasoning for this is simple:
1) Sue is a fucking whore so I doubt anyone in their right minds would work with that bitch.
2) Everyone else has something about them that someone else despises and if that was taken into consideration we'd all be still trolling Open Free for all for goatse porn.
3) This project is not exclusionary due to past forum hijinks and if it ever becomes so the project immediately will have earned a new critic, mainly me.
4)This project is about getting over past bullshit and growing up.
Giving Kevin a chance was about either allowing him to grow up or allowing him to make a fool out of himself. That is his responsibility and his alone.
That's my point.
--- End quote ---
Ok thanks for taking the time to clear that up. at first I thought ye were calling me a nut job....in which I was about to take issue with.
I am not involved in APALL at all as you know.
My comment to psy was a knee jerk reaction . More like, damn it didn't work out for psy on this, wish he would've listened.
I understand why ye are doing the rules of the org like that, but I just thought that it wasted time for you is all.
-DP
Che Gookin:
It worked out quite well for Psy, and in the right way.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version