Author Topic: MBA and their collaborators  (Read 1972 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Covergaard

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 484
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.carstenovergaard.dk
MBA and their collaborators
« on: January 18, 2007, 03:00:59 PM »
http://www.ode.state.or.us/services/dis ... 99-143.pdf

I was looking for info about Lifesteps and found the document above by acident.

It seems that a lot of people benefit from placing people at TBS regardless of the fact, that there were good local programs in the neighbourhood.

It also seems that education at such places is not exactly up to standard and some of the wilderness therapist is not quite educated up to standard.

I have found several such documents giving me a hint that someone is out there milking the tax-payers wallets.

What do you say?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
MBA and their collaborators
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2007, 04:21:14 PM »
You'll find such hearings all over the internet. Wish all districts were as savvy and didn't spend our tax dollars on over-priced babysitting. The insurance companies need to get on board too.
Look at what they said about Education and Therapy at Mount Bachelor Academy. Academy!! They aren't even a school.

Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Various witnesses expressed a concern that if J. J. were again to have access to drugs and alcohol (which apparently are unavailable in the isolated and supervised environment of MBA) he would return to substance abuse. It is not the District?s responsibility to shield J. J. from this danger after school hours, but the IEP provided that J. J.?s mentor could assist J. J.?s parents, at their request , in coordinating county drug and alcohol services for J. J.

Peer Relationships
J. J.?s difficulties in getting along with his peers has been an ongoing theme of his education. The IEP provided specific strategies to assist J. J. in developing appropriate social skills. The small number of students in the BIS program (18 in the current year), the low ratio of teachers to students, and the daily group therapy sessions should all be helpful in preventing J. J. from isolating himself from his peers. Also, the BIS program is located in the West Linn high school, where J. J. would have the opportunity to be in classes with students not in the special education program. This would allow him to observe behavior of high functioning (behaviorally and academically) students and - it is hoped - eventually form relationships with nondisabled students who could be a positive influence on his development.

Work Completion
Ms. Leonard reported in May 1999 that J. J. was struggling with completing his class and homework, and the September 9, 1999 IEP indicated that J. J. continued to need support to stay on task for work completion. To address this difficulty - and the parents? concern that J.J. would ?outwait? his teachers and do no school work - the IEP includes a unique arrangement whereby, whenever J.J. failed to complete his classwork, he would be required to remain in school and work with a tutor provided by the District from 2:30 - 5:00 p.m. If he did not complete his homework he would be required to return to it at school the next day.

Educational Benefit
Dr. Conway, Ms. Bitz and J.J.?s parents expressed the belief that J.J. was not ready to leave the highly structured and supervised environment provided at MBA, and that he would regress during after-school hours and his behavior would deteriorate. Even if this is true, it does not prove that J. J. would not receive educational benefit from his IEP.
Ms. Pack-Patton, Ms. Harrell and Mr. Dunn all believed that J.J.?s IEP could be implemented at the BIS program even if J.J.?s parents were unable to provide adequate reinforcement at home. Mr. Miller believed J.J. could be successful in the BIS program even if his parents had difficulty
controlling his behavior at home, although J.J.?s likelihood of attaining his annual goals in the September IEP would be diminished if he did not behave well at home. Ms. Pack-Patton observed that students with the kinds of problems J.J. experienced often had trouble in the community with
their peers and parents, and that it was usually more successful to maintain them in the community where they needed to develop new skills.
As Ms. Pack-Patton and Ms. Harrell have the most personal experience with the BIS program, the students it serves and its effectiveness, I give their testimony the most weight in evaluating this issue.

MBA and Other Residential Placements
FINAL ORDER
J.J. & West Linn-Wilsonville S.D., Page 38
The parents, in their initial hearing request, claimed the District was denying J.J. a FAPE by refusing to continue his enrollment at MBA. Subsequently they broadened their claim by asserting that J.J. required placement at MBA or another residential facility in order to receive a FAPE.
Despite this change in the parents? assertion, all of their evidence is essentially related to J.J.?s education at MBA. For example, both Dr.Conway and Dr. Moran noted that if J.J. did not have the opportunity to finish his MBA program it would represent another (damaging) failure for him. This claim is irrelevant both to any educational need J.J. may have and to the parents? later position that J.J. could receive a FAPE at a residential facility other than MBA.
MBA cannot provide J. J. with a FAPE. It lacks the trained personnel necessary to implement the counseling provisions of J.J.?s September 1999 IEP, which (other than the placement recommendation) met with the approval of all participants. In fact, it lacks any mental health professionals or trained special education teachers who can address the ?psychiatric issues? which Dr. Conway identified as ?a formidable barrier to [J.J.?s] ability to benefit from regular educational opportunities.?
See excerpt from Dr. Conway?s April 1999 evaluation, quoted in Exhibit A57. It does not offer daily communication with J.J.?s parents. And, significantly, it provides few opportunities for students to interact with nondisabled peers. Another residential facility might be able to satisfy the requirements in the September 1999 IEP. Nevertheless, no residential facility would be the least restrictive environment in which J.J. can receive educational benefit.

Summary
The BIS program, with the additional supports and services described in the September 1999 IEP, offers J.J. a free, appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment where he can receive educational benefit. There is no convincing evidence that J.J. requires a residential
placement in order to receive educational benefit. Rather, the evidence indicates that the parents enrolled J.J. in MBA because, despite their strenuous and loving efforts, it had become impossible for them to control J.J. or feel comfortable and safe with him at home.
A residential placement in a remote location in central Oregon is a considerably more restrictive option for J.J. than education in the BIS program at a local high school, where he would interact with nondisabled as well as disabled students and would be able to live with his parents. It therefore does not meet the mandate of the IDEA. See 20 USC §1412(a)(5), 34 CFR§300.550.
FINAL ORDER
J.J. & West Linn-Wilsonville S.D., Page 39
ORDER:
The District offered J.J. a free, appropriate public education in accordance with the terms of his September 9, 1999 IEP, although the District refused to implement the IEP in a residential facility.
________________________________
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
MBA and their collaborators
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2007, 06:13:01 PM »
Oh, this is good too. Explorations- the wilderness program with no professionals (which Aspen acquires in 2003) recommends an RTC with no professionals. What's up with this "Wilderness Assessment Course"?

From July 15 - August 9, 1998 J. J. attended a Wilderness Assessment Course (WAC) :question:  at Explorations Inc. in Montana. Activities included three weeks of backpacking, journal assignments and individual and group counseling in a wilderness area (with three instructors
and six other campers), followed by three days of solo experience in which J. J. was alone in a wilderness environment. The goal of the program was to evaluate J. J.?s ?current motivational status and to identify problem areas and recommend strategies for future development.? Exhibit A35.
33. Jessica Ruehrwein, the WAC program coordinator, was a ?lead therapist and instructor? in J.J.?s course. She has an M.S. degree in Natural Resource Sociology. There is no indication that she has any education or formal training in counseling, psychology or education.
Explorations Inc. reported that her ?professional experience [included] counseling adult and juvenile probationers, facilitating ropes course experiences, and working as a wilderness therapist and guide
.? Exhibit A35.
34. A letter to J. J.?s parents dated August 17, 1998, reporting on his experience at WAC, was signed by Ms. Ruehrwein, ?Kevin Junker, Ed. M,? and the co-directors of Explorations Inc. The letter identified multiple facts which appeared ?to be affecting [J.J.?s] ability to behave appropriately at home and to stay focused in a classroom setting?: low self esteem
(manifested in J.J.?s unwillingness to attempt new tasks or participate as a member of the group because of his fear of failure); separation anxiety (related at least in part to being an adopted child); denial (difficulty admitting to himself and family the problems he was experiencing at home and at school) and manipulation (feigning illness in an attempt to be
excused from the wilderness activities); acting out; and anger (opposition to following instructions or work assignments).
The assessment resulted in the following conclusion:
?[It] is our most adamant recommendation that [J. J.?s] future educational and emotional needs can only be met in a 24 hour a day residential program setting where a consistent behavioral program can be administered both inside and outside the classroom, and where [J. J.] can be integrated as a team member into a group of his peers. A program that will therapeutically respond to his in-class behavior with consistent consequences both in and out of class will help motivate him to stay focused upon his classroom studies and homework assignments. [J. J.] tends to isolate himself. His involvement in a peer group will also help motivate him and give him the kind of social support and recognition that cannot come from his parents or teachers. A residential program will help [J. J.] identify those characteristics in peers that will help him achieve his goals to attain a successful future and enjoy productive social interaction. As you were also informed, it is our recommendation that J. J. be immediately entered into such a program and not be allowed to return
home due to our concern that relapse from the gains made during the course would soon occur.
We absolutely concur with your apparent decision to enroll [J. J.] in a program such as Mount Bachelor Academy . . . . We do not see [J. J.] succeeding in any type of public school program where he lives at home and does not have the rigid structure
present in a residential school setting. . . .?
Exhibit A35. Similar information was contained in a confidential report dated August 18, 1998, signed by Jessica Ries, M.S. (one of the wilderness instructors), and reviewed and approved by Mr. Junker. Exhibit A36. That report included the comment, ?[J. J.?s] parents admit that they are probably too lenient with [J. J.] at home.?
35. J. J. attended WAC with the approval of Dr. Moran. Dr. Moran considered WAC one step beyond hospitalization, as it took place 24 hours per day, out of the reach of civilization. Dr. Moran last saw J. J. on August 20, 1998, shortly after the WAC program ended. J. J. was
still making the kinds of statements which had concerned Dr. Moran earlier, and Dr. Moran was struck by the depth of his emotional disturbance
. Dr. Moran felt J. J.?s thinking errors were so substantial that anything less than a residential program would be inadequate for
him. Dr. Moran observed that J. J. needs help in relating to his peers. He sabotages his relationships with his parents and teachers. One advantage of a residential program for J. J. is that he has to learn conflict resolution, as he cannot separate from his peers. Dr. Moran also commented, however, that in a constricted environment such as Mt. Bachelor Academy
(MBA) it is important to have experiences to relate to peers outside of the program.
36. J. J. is expected to complete his program at MBA in August 2000. Dr. Moran was concerned that if J. J. were taken from his residential program prematurely the risks could be substantial. If he has not internalized appropriate strategies ?he is going to lose.? Also, if he has not achieved the level of success he needs it would confirm his worst fears. He has not
had a lot of success, especially as it is associated with learning.
37. On August 25, 1998 Mr. Taylor sent Dr. Welch, the Special Services Coordinator at the District, a copy of the August 17, 1998 letter from WAC staff and indicated the parents were considering possible placements for J. J. at MBA and Boulder Creek Academy. He stated the parents would enroll J. J. in ?an appropriate residential facility if the District [could not] offer an appropriate placement by September 11, 1998,? and would seek tuition reimbursement from the District. Exhibit A37.  :o
In September 1998, after speaking on the telephone with Dr. J., Dr. Moran recommended to District representatives that J. J. be enrolled in a residential program.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
MBA and their collaborators
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2007, 09:55:43 PM »
Gets even better.
A copy of this hearing should accompany a letter to every school in the country so they're on the lookout for such scams.
Time for programs to stop ripping off tax payer money and defrauding insurance companies. Want high-priced babysitting, pay for it yourself.

J. J. entered MBA in September 1998. MBA is a ?year round? coeducational school located in a rural and isolated setting 35 miles east of Prineville, in central Oregon. The students are between ages 13 and 18. Sharon Bitz is the executive director of MBA. She has been employed at the school in various capacities since 1990. She has a B.A. degree in business administration.
MBA has a ?personal growth program,? or emotional growth curriculum, divided into three main phases. In the lower school a student?s actions and behaviors receive primary emphasis. In the middle school the focus is on the student?s emotions. In the upper school the approach emphasizes the cognitive process. (J. J. began in the lower school and around June 1999 entered the middle school.) Each student is assigned a mentor who is responsible for managing the details of the student?s life, including emotional growth progress, peer interactions and academic progress. Each student participates in nine sequential, developmentally based workshops called ?Lifesteps.? Exhibit A45.

41. MBA students live in dormitories with three or four roommates. Some students participate in community service and community outreach programs. Students are able to call their families every other week, and mentors call each student?s family approximately every three weeks. MBA offers four parent seminars at the institution each year. Several times throughout the year a representative from MBA travels to different areas of the country to participate in local parent support groups. Exhibit A45.

At the time of the hearing no-one on the staff at MBA was certified to teach special education students, and there were no licensed mental health professionals on the staff.

3 On March 3, 1999 the Oregon Department of Education (ODE)informed Ms.Bitz that her application to operate early intervention and special education programs and services for children with disabilities had been reviewed and approved. MBA was required to report any major program change that would modify the program?s approved application. MBA failed to notify ODE, before this hearing began, that there was no longer anyone on its staff who was certified to teach special education students.

FINAL ORDER
J.J. & West Linn-Wilsonville S.D., Page 14
42. MBA has a 1:3 ratio of staff to students. The educational program on Monday through Thursday consists of half a day of academic classes and half day sessions in communication, emotional growth and cognitive behavior modification. On Fridays students have opportunities for field trips, group recreation and outdoor activities. In the evening there is study time for homework and social time. The students are supervised from 7:15 a.m. until bedtime at 9:30 p.m. Activities are less structured in the evening, which is when J. J. tended to get into trouble. There are few or no opportunities for contact with persons outside MBA (except during family visits) unless a student participates in extracurricular sports (players go to games and fans may go as a special privilege) or community service projects. J. J. participated in few or none of these outside activities.

43. Among various initial entry information sheets about J. J. from MBA there are what appear to be notes of a telephone interview with J. J?s father. Near the top of the page are the words, ?Nancy Smith?s.? At the end of the page is the following entry: ?9/14 called Nancy to request info @ [J. J.] & how weak father is at setting boundaries.?4

44. Dr. Patrick Conway is ?the MBA consulting psychologist. Each student has three sessions with Dr. Conway in the first month following their [sic] enrollment, and one session every six months thereafter. . . . Dr. Conway, in conjunction with the team of professionals at Lifeworks of Central Oregon, serves Mount Bachelor Academy by providing clinical
oversight for the students throughout their MBA experience.? Exhibit A45 (MBA brochure).

46. Ms. Andrea Hungerford, one of the District?s attorneys, worked with Dr. Welch to obtain the independent evaluation of J. J. that was agreed upon at the September 1998 IEP meeting.

4 There appears to be some connection between WAC and MBA. Nancy Smith is the name of the educational consultant at WAC. See Exhibit A36. Also, on the same page of notes, next to some information about the WAC program, are the words ?Jessica? and ?Kevin.? These are the names of the persons who signed the confidential report about J. J.?s experience at WAC........

Back to Conway.....
Conway testified that he thought his October 1998 evaluation of J. J. was for MBA and J. J.?s parents.  :roll:
Dr. Conway was again retained by the District in June 1999 to observe and comment on the BIS program. Ms. Andrea Hungerford contacted Dr. Conway to make the necessary arrangements. Dr. Conway was aware the District was seeking information in relation to J. J.?s placement. Before
accepting the assignment Dr. Conway did not inform Ms. Hungerford that he was a regular consultant for MBA or ask whether she was aware of that fact. He did not directly confirm with Ms. Hungerford that the District wished to make use of his services despite his potential conflict of
interest.
Ms. Hungerford remained unaware of the connection between Dr. Conway and MBA until she received the MBA brochure while preparing for this hearing. The District would never have employed Dr. Conway to review the BIS program in June 1999 had the connection been disclosed beforehand.
The belated disclosure of the relationship between Dr. Conway and MBA has engendered bitter recriminations by the District. I have neither the authority nor the knowledge to determine whether Dr. Conway?s conduct in this matter violated any ethical constraints applicable to school psychologists.

Soundin' good, then cops out.... Sh0ulda granted the Districts motion.

At best, what happened resulted from a failure by Dr. Conway to be scrupulously careful in disclosing his affiliation with MBA, and (with hindsight) a failure by Ms. Andrea Hungerford to be scrupulously careful in inquiring about Dr. Conway?s affiliations. Although I denied the District?s motion to bar Dr. Conway?s testimony and strike ?those portions of his evaluation and report regarding recommended placement for J. J.,? in evaluating the weight of Dr. Conway?s opinions I have taken note of his ongoing association with MBA. I do not consider him a neutral witness.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: MBA and their collaborators
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2008, 12:04:55 PM »
It figures that they would send Sharon Bitz to court for them. She is, in many ways, the perfect MBA lackey. Their ultimate work-horse when it comes to propaganda and reputation control with parents and especially the surrounding community.

For instance, although it is a very common phrase for the staff at MBA to tell students who complain about the lack of proper addiction treatment that "Hey, MBA isn't a residential treatment center. It's an emotional growth boarding school." And they just left it at that if you ever inquired as to the reason that there was one licensed drug and alcohol counselor on staff who no one was required to see. Sharon Bitz, however, wrote a whole essay entitled "MBA as a Recovery Program." She is willing to say anything as long as it benefits the organization she represents.

I've been "evaluated" by Dr. Conway. That man has a totally sweet deal; like half his entire practice is giving drugs to these kids who have no choice whether they see him or not, and also have no choice about whether they do indeed want take the drugs. If you "refuse" your meds at MBA, they tend to send you to work projects until you take them, and graveling the parking lot or digging ditches isn't exactly fun during withdrawal from powerful psychiatric drugs. Also, despite the fact that I asked him three appointments (that's three months) in a row to take me off my meds, he never did. Every time he would agree with me, saying, "That sounds like a good plan. I just have to get a hold of your parents and confirm the decision with them. I'll get right on it." And then the next month I would be back and he would say the same thing. Eventually I went cold turkey off of them which I had to do because the nurse refused to titrate me off of my meds without the psychiatrist's approval, and he wouldn't give that approval despite the fact that my parents had called and requested it.

Every time I saw the line of people waiting at the meds closet I thought about the scene in One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest where a nurse cheerily announces that it's medication time and all of these zombied out motherfuckers walk up to get more drugs. That place was way over-medicated, I remember kids who were so out of it that they just stared into space for most of the day and you would have to repeat every question you asked them two or three times to elicit an answer.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »