Announcements & Tech Support > Web forum hosting

Delete posts by TheWho!!

<< < (3/4) > >>

dishdutyfugitive:
So pre-2005 there was another Who?

Anonymous:
Since Who, and other trolls, keeps repeating his arguments why don't we just start a thread with generic repetetive resposes to the positions Who poses? Every time Who posts, in what is always a mutant version of the same thing he has said for years, anyone can just reference the thread and cut/paste the same response over and over. Why argue anymore? The counter arguments have already been made, the pertinent questions have already been asked that he will not answer. It could go something like this.

Who: I think it's beneficial for the healthy development of families to traumatically and forcefully remove the children and sever communication so they can heal in an isolated environment, just like when someone goes in for surgery. The family is not in there to help with the surgery are they?

[insert response from list here]


? :) ?

Antigen:

--- Quote from: "dishdutyfugitive" ---So pre-2005 there was another Who?
--- End quote ---

There have been a bunch of them; Lee Colburn, Nazzi. Probably none so dedicated. Then again, we've never had this little traffic. Maybe it's just easier to flood a forum when there's so little participation.

Guest:

--- Quote from: "Antigen" ---God, don't you guys remember the last several rounds of this game? It's a game of futility and diminishing returns. Whatever I may delete will just be reposted twice. Whomever I may try to ban will just turn up under anon or other usernames from various ips. Meanwhile, the meaningful, worthwhile discussion we all crave and miss will be buried under heaping piles of stinking horse shit about censorship and bias.

It's not asif we haven't been through this a half dozen times before or more.
--- End quote ---

when there was guest posting on the can forum the crap was deleted well enough. IT CAN BE DONE

Guest:

--- Quote from: "Who response thread?" ---Since Who, and other trolls, keeps repeating his arguments why don't we just start a thread with generic repetetive resposes to the positions Who poses? Every time Who posts, in what is always a mutant version of the same thing he has said for years, anyone can just reference the thread and cut/paste the same response over and over. Why argue anymore? The counter arguments have already been made, the pertinent questions have already been asked that he will not answer. It could go something like this.

Who: I think it's beneficial for the healthy development of families to traumatically and forcefully remove the children and sever communication so they can heal in an isolated environment, just like when someone goes in for surgery. The family is not in there to help with the surgery are they?

[insert response from list here]


? :) ?
--- End quote ---

yeah, i think that's a good secondary solution, if you won't delete who-slime.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version