Suisse-sChefs acting like children

[Anonymous]

I've had psychiatrists and mental health practioners read your posts and it's quite frankly, chilling and telling about your entire puropse here on fornits.

Please don't tease us like this. Could you have an actual professional please post something on Fornits about their diagnosis of TheWho based on his writings, or give something concrete for you to post?

[TheWho]

I've had psychiatrists and mental health practioners read your posts and it's quite frankly, chilling and telling about your entire puropse here on fornits.

Please don't tease us like this. Could you have an actual professional please post something on Fornits about their diagnosis of TheWho based on his writings, or give something concrete for you to post?

TheWho is laying down, tell it to us slowly.

[Anonymous]

just when you think fornits posters can't get any more pathetic, they go and do something like this. good show. bravo.

[Anonymous]

Hi Sue! How's that lawsuit working out for you?

[Froderik]

TheWho is worried about: A ten-year-old reading porn and hate sites on Fornits.

TheWho is NOT worried about: That same ten-year-old getting sent away to the custody of sadists.

You can tell a lot about a man- or even TheWho- by his priorities.

//bump\

[Ursus]

I am a parent who had a child attend a wilderness program and a TBS, who happened to benefit from her experience and why this pisses people off and cause everyone to attack her I will never understand.

I don't recall people attacking TheWho's daughter.  Is there something I'm missing?  Is TheWho's daughter actually someone else we've come to know and love...?

[Anonymous]

Y'know, (as Ginger-Antigen-Cassandra-Scarlett-C. likes to say) it's what one might call getting "pretty deep", you fornit's types who have slandered people who happen to have a difference of opinion with you for so, so long.

Have a look at what recent internet law says about some of your ravings and rantings(materials that are linked on post to this board,  by the way):

[For bloggers, all Defamation legal rules apply to their posts. But there are many complications in applying them. First, many people who post online comments, and probably those tending to make the most inflammatory and false statements, will do so anonymously, for obvious reasons. So the first threshold is identifying the blogger making Defamatory claims. Several things make this difficult, as well. Since the blogger probably will not identify themselves when the issue comes to light, there needs to be a legal process that allows identification. They can be traced by high-tech means, but a court must agree via summary judgment that all the elements of Defamation have been met

Well I would imagine that this threshold could be met in terms of posts here on many counts, wouldn't you think?

Let's have a look at what constitutes libel on the internet or on paper, taken from the same document:

There are also four subjects that if falsely dispersed as a fact about another person, are actionable on their face: Attacking a person's professional character /standing; Alleging an unmarried person is unchaste; Claims a person is infected with a sexually transmitted, or loathsome disease; Claims a person has committed a crime of moral turpitude (my highlighting of section

Now, just from my own point of view, I'd say that most if not all of those who have ever disagreed with the fornit's party line have been subjected to at least one of these false attacks (myself included).

So what's your defense, those of you who've taken part in these antics?

Or is it only a matter of some court giving the go-ahead to use extraordinary cyber-measures to track you down?

[Anonymous]

I would say you've been visiting Sue-Sue's site and copying a lot of material from her latest blob.

[Anonymous]

I don't see the original source cited for all that copying.  "Y'know"... she might sue you.

[ZenAgent]

I think I recall you being banned from ST, or am I wrong?.  I was banned because I am probably one of the only people who refuse to conform to the group think and still stick around and I expected that type of treatment.  It turned out to be a mistake anyway, that is why I am here.

That's interesting, man.  You recently said you didn't know anything about StrugglingTeens, now you sound like a vet and can remember who's been banned.  I got banned...never was allowed back.  Psy was banned, Reggie North was banned and his name can never be spoken in Alonzo's presence.  Our "badges of honor" for not conforming to ST's group think.  We didn't have the luxury of presenting opposing views on St. Alonzo's profit-oriented forum like you're permitted on Fornits, and yet you still take that privilege for granted and bitch and moan and play the martyr.  No one expects you to conform to the group think, you're in the business of doing business and this forum is useful to you.  You need to do...whatever it is you're trying to do... here on Fornits, otherwise you would spend your time on ST with like-minded people, never having to worry about what's satire and what's flat-out prurient material.

You're right, it was a mistake that brought you back here.

As for Fornits "group think" :  we have our reasons for being here, too.  No argument you make for the industry is going to change the fact my wife and step daughter were abused, treated like shit and kept apart for over six months.  PV did physical and mental damage to my step daughter under the guise of the "therapeutic process" and "clinical necessity", which included over-medication, medical neglect and long stretches in isolation.  

When someone says "I'd kill anyone who hurt my family", the comment doesn't get much more reaction than a nod.  Programs like PV fuck-up families far too often with complete impunity, hiding behind admission contracts, waivers, and a total lack of regulation.

You should read back, I haven’t given you crap for threatening to posting my name.  I was giving you crap because that is what you are resorting to when people disagree with you.  You were not this person when you started posting here.  I still believe in the freedom of people posting what they feel, even if it goes against my grain (well maybe not porn and hate sites).  You have lost that, Zen, you are as low as they get defending this crap.

You read back - I didn't defend it, I said the collage on one thread was revolting.  I also mentioned my step daughter won't read Fornits because the content is too rough for her.  She made the choice not to read Fornits.  You have the same option.

As far as trolling…you are the one trolling me.  I merely posted an opinion on “Web forum hostingâ€

[ZenAgent]

[For bloggers, all Defamation legal rules apply to their posts. But there are many complications in applying them. First, many people who post online comments, and probably those tending to make the most inflammatory and false statements, will do so anonymously, for obvious reasons. So the first threshold is identifying the blogger making Defamatory claims. Several things make this difficult, as well. Since the blogger probably will not identify themselves when the issue comes to light, there needs to be a legal process that allows identification. They can be traced by high-tech means, but a court must agree via summary judgment that all the elements of Defamation have been met

And who the hell are you?  Dammit, we'll have to use the high-tech means.

I understand what you're talking about, though.  It's like when WWASP wanted Sue Scheff's hard drive, and all the information WWASP wanted had been wiped out, deleted, trashed.  No fault of Sue's, or course.

Praise be to God, Carey Bock's hard drive contained all the emails WWASP wanted, and everyone breathed a sigh of relief.  Right, Sue?  (If you're around)

There are also four subjects that if falsely dispersed as a fact about another person, are actionable on their face: Attacking a person's professional character /standing; Alleging an unmarried person is unchaste; Claims a person is infected with a sexually transmitted, or loathsome disease; Claims a person has committed a crime of moral turpitude (my highlighting of section)

First, you have to prove what we're dispersing is false.  Second, there's a difference between attacking and being critical.  As far as the other three go, I don't want to think about certain people engaging in moral turpitude while infected with Cooties, married or not.  We've had enough sick porn for one day.

Now, just from my own point of view, I'd say that most if not all of those who have ever disagreed with the fornit's party line have been subjected to at least one of these false attacks (myself included).

So what's your defense, those of you who've taken part in these antics?

Or is it only a matter of some court giving the go-ahead to use extraordinary cyber-measures to track you down?

Oh please, Mr. Who, don't be putting those cyber-measures on our asses.  

My defense will be the display of all your past posts, including the ones you've made as an anon.  We can identify the libelous  posts you made anonymously with our cutting edge, high-tech, extremely expensive cyber-measures.

How's that case of crotch rot your sister dosed you with?

[Che Gookin]

to much boo hoo hoo and not enough hee haw haw..


sorry boys.. can't bring myself to give a fuck about Sue or her little whorish minions.

[TheWho]

That's interesting, man. You recently said you didn't know anything about StrugglingTeens, now you sound like a vet and can remember who's been banned. I got banned...never was allowed back.

I remember because you cried like a school girl when you got caught lying to parents and misrepresenting yourself and they exposed you for it and banned you from posting there.  Don’t play the victim.  Struggling teens was set up for people to have an honest and open conversation about the industry… most parents, myself included, don’t appreciate your immature remarks like “How's that case of crotch rot your sister dosed you with?â€

[Anonymous]

Zen, if you take the previous post without a huge chunk of salt, you'll be the last person to take TheWho seriously, and who really wants to be stuck in that position?

His name. Not some long-winded response to this sort of baiting trollery.

[ZenAgent]

That's interesting, man. You recently said you didn't know anything about StrugglingTeens, now you sound like a vet and can remember who's been banned. I got banned...never was allowed back.

I remember because you cried like a school girl when you got caught lying to parents and misrepresenting yourself and they exposed you for it and banned you from posting there.  Don’t play the victim.  Struggling teens was set up for people to have an honest and open conversation about the industry… most parents, myself included, don’t appreciate your immature remarks like “How's that case of crotch rot your sister dosed you with?â€