Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
Did Sumner Hawley have sexual relations with students?
Ursus:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Ursus,
You specialize in trashing reputations without backing up your claims. Defend your statement that Sumner molested Hyde boys.
Mike
--- End quote ---
Sounds to me like you are libeling me, Mike. Find my alleged statement. I have nothing to defend myself against. I never used the word "boys."
The first usage of the word "boys" was by that extremely obvious troll in the company or employ of Hyde or the Gaulds themselves sometime last night, the post you seized upon and thanked as "Friend." Any observant Reader would have immediately recognized an attempt to elicit inflammatory and ill-thought excess of language on the part of Fornits posters, possibly to be used against them at a later date. Thus far, you have been the only one to bite and sling pure mud; unfortunately for them, not in the direction they were hoping for.
Get a grip on yourself. You are playing right into their hands.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Ursus,
You specialize in trashing reputations without backing up your claims. Defend your statement that Sumner molested Hyde boys.
Mike
--- End quote ---
I have nothing to defend myself against. I never used the word "boys." .
--- End quote ---
That is all I wanted you hear you say.
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" --- Get a grip on yourself. You are playing right into their hands.
--- End quote ---
Whose? Billy's?
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Ursus,
You specialize in trashing reputations without backing up your claims. Defend your statement that Sumner molested Hyde boys.
Mike
--- End quote ---
Sounds to me like you are libeling me, Mike. Find my alleged statement. I have nothing to defend myself against. I never used the word "boys."
The first usage of the word "boys" was by that extremely obvious troll in the company or employ of Hyde or the Gaulds themselves sometime last night, the post you seized upon and thanked as "Friend." Any observant Reader would have immediately recognized an attempt to elicit inflammatory and ill-thought excess of language on the part of Fornits posters, possibly to be used against them at a later date. Thus far, you have been the only one to bite and sling pure mud; unfortunately for them, not in the direction they were hoping for.
Get a grip on yourself. You are playing right into their hands.
--- End quote ---
I believe you used the phrase "child molester" which would imply boys, given that the allegation is homosexual pedophilia.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---It is from Ursus' IP. Did you think only admins were privy to that information?
--- End quote ---
It is not from my IP#. You are not privy to much here that I am aware of. You might be privy to more if you chose to register as a user, but that is your choice.
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Che Gookin"" ---Could you please demonstrate how Ursus has destroyed what credibility the forums have had? Again.. be specific and back up your claims.
--- End quote ---
I will tell Ursus directly. Or have you appointed yourself his guardian as well?
Mike
--- End quote ---
I need no guardian but appreciate the gesture, although I tend to doubt it was intended as such.
Where have I made "a calculatedly noncommittal or evasive statement?" Moreover, is there some kind of Mike's Law that I am violating by doing so? Last time I checked, this was within the range of complexities that human language encompasses.
More importantly: Why are you stalking me?
--- End quote ---
Ursus,
You are paranoid. First it was a Billy complex. Now it is a Mike complex. I left the Hyde forum only once, to report, in the appropriate forum, a problem about pornography. Go back and look: you and Joe started posting there after me.
You specialize in trashing reputations without backing up your claims. Defend your statement that Sumner molested Hyde boys.
Mike
--- End quote ---
Prince Albert was not porn. It was an example of youth going to great length to shock in a desperate attempt to garner attention. The intent of porn is to titillate, to appeal to the puriant interest of the consumer. The Pa post was intened to shock and offend. I certainly did not post the cupchics to titillate. It was meant to be offensive.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Prince Albert was not porn. It was an example of youth going to great length to shock in a desperate attempt to garner attention. The intent of porn is to titillate, to appeal to the puriant interest of the consumer. The Pa post was intened to shock and offend. I certainly did not post the cupchics to titillate. It was meant to be offensive.
--- End quote ---
There's not enough here already to shock and offend you?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version