Just curious - what makes anyone think Izzy and Sue are no longer friends and professional colleagues?
Because she seemingly had a change of heart after reading the WWASPS transcripts? That is ludicrous for all the reasons pointed out in the above referenced article.
If you think about it, all Izzy did in response to be outted in the Patti Atwoods emails was take down her links to Pure, delete Sue as Caica's advocate of the month, and get rid of blogs like the Whitmore one and those that promoted her relationship with Sue Scheff.
These actions, in and of themselves, tell us nothing about the status of Izzy and Sue's relationship yet it seems some people are all too willing to accept them as proof positive that Izzy has "seen the light" and as such, redeemed herself.
Personally, I find that given the lack of any formal statement by either Izzy or Sue as well as the failure by Izzy to include the lawsuit against Sue Scheff and Focal Point Academy on the CAICA Litigation and Program News webpages, there is only one logical conclusion one can draw.
So what's the real deal? Is this all an elaborate ruse? A way for Izzy to cover her ass so to speak before the news of the lawsuit against Scheff was announced?