Author Topic: Pavel, Come Home  (Read 1432 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Pavel, Come Home
« on: October 15, 2007, 12:45:22 PM »
Well, the jubilation was too soon; relief at Paul's new-found sanity after escaping from J.Z.Knight's Ramtha cult was short-lived and unfounded.  He fled to London for a reason:  Lynne McTaggart.  Hopefully this will be a kindler, gentler sort of guru fascination...

Paul, if you're reading this, I'm sorry.  I truly mean you no harm.  But, Buddy, pah-leez wake up and stop wasting your time and heart on these people...

From news.bigg.net, I believe these are "Press Releases" paid for by the poster:

=============================================

Top scientists team up with author to create the world's largest ever mind-over-matter experiment.[/i]

Can our thoughts influence the world around us? This extraordinary possibility is being tested throughout 2007 in a series of mind-over-matter experiments that are being monitored by leading physicists.

Tens of thousands of volunteers from around the world are being recruited to participate in a series of web-based experiments, making it the largest mind-over-matter study in history.

The experiments are the brain-child of science writer Lynne McTaggart, whose new book The Intention Experiment forms the catalyst for the trials.

The book is published in the New Year in the US, (Simon & Schuster) the UK (Harper Collins) and The Netherlands (Ankh-Hermes).

Working with her are leading physicists and psychologists from the University of Arizona, Princeton University, the International Institute of Biophysics and the Institute of Noetic Sciences.

The first large-scale studies are being prepared by Dr. Gary Schwartz, psychologist and director of America's National Institutes of Medicine-funded Center for Frontier Medicine in Biofield Science at the University of Arizona.

Besides Schwartz, other scientists working in the consortium include: German physicist Dr. Fritz-Albert Popp of the International Institute of Biophysics in Neuss, Germany; Dr. Robert Jahn and Brenda Dunne of the International Consciousness Research Laboratory, formerly of Princeton University; and Drs Marilyn Schlitz and Dean Radin of the Institute of Noetic Sciences in California.

Through the Intention Experiment website ([url=http://www.theintentionexperiment.com]www.theintentionexperiment.com
), readers of McTaggart's new book are invited to participate in an unprecedented experiment: to test the power of their thoughts.

The study will conduct periodic large-scale experiments to determine whether the focused intention of its readers has an effect on scientifically quantifiable targets in various laboratories around the globe -- a specific living thing or a population where change caused by group intention can be measured.

Website specialists working with the scientists through the website will coordinate reader involvement and track results.  A pilot experiment, testing the idea and detailed in the book, was successful.

McTaggart asked a group of 16 meditators based in London to direct their thoughts to four remote targets in Dr. Popp's laboratory in Germany:  two types of algae, a plant and a human volunteer.  The meditators were asked to attempt to lower certain measurable biodynamic processes.  Popp and his team discovered significant changes in all four targets while the intentions were being sent, compared to times the meditators were 'resting.'

Schwartz and McTaggart are preparing the target for the first intention experiment target, an enclosed 'mini-Gaia' with an artificially raised temperature.  The plan is to ask the readers to attempt to lower it at a particular moment through focused 'intention.'

"If we're successful the implications would be amazing," says Schwartz.  "It would suggest that our collective human consciousness can actually do something about global warming."

In the course of her research into her earlier book, The Field, McTaggart uncovered literally hundreds of scientific studies carried out by reputable frontier scientists, which suggested that consciousness, under certain circumstances, has the capacity to change physical matter.  These studies, all published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, showed evidence that directing thoughts at a target is capable of altering machines, cells and, indeed, entire multicelled organisms like human beings.

The ongoing experiments will solely focus on philanthropic targets.  Other possibilities being discussed by the scientific consortium include using a child with Attention Deficit Disorder or an adult with Alzheimer's disease.

One eventual target could be determining whether focused group intention will enable wounds to heal more quickly than usual. It is known and accepted that wounds generally heal at a particular, quantifiable rate with a precise pattern. Any departure from the norm can be precisely measured and shown to be an experimental effect.

The global Intention Experiment laboratory is to be entirely self-funded. The website and all the experiments will be funded by the proceeds of the book or grants, now and in the future.

McTaggart stresses that she cannot guarantee that the big experiments will work -- at first or ever. "As scientists and objective researchers, we will be duty-bound to faithfully report the data we have.

But what's most important is just being willing to ask the questions," says McTaggart.  "That's what real science is, and that's what we're doing with the Intention Experiments. Just being unafraid to ask what seems like a outrageous question."

The Intention Experiment, published by Free Press, Simon & Schuster in the US (HarperCollins in the UK), is the first book firmly grounded in science that explains how human thoughts and intentions are an actual physical something.

The Intention Experiment builds on the discoveries of McTaggart's first book, international bestseller The Field: The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe. The Field, which documented discoveries that point to the existence of a quantum energy field holding everything -- including each one of us -- in its invisible web.

The Field was lauded around the world, by notables such Sir Arthur C. Clarke and Dr. Wayne Dyer, as the first book to synthesize all the discoveries from frontier quantum physicists about the nature of consciousness into a unified theory, comprehensive to the ordinary layman.  Dyer called it "the most profound and enlightening book I have ever read."

For more information please contact: Pavel Mikoloski Living the Field London DDI:+44 (0)208 971 1660 Main:+44 (0)208 944 9555 Fax: +44 (0)870 444 9887
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ed Legg

  • Posts: 45
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Pavel, Come Home
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2007, 01:18:00 PM »
Ol Doc Popp is a very busy man.  He is involved in the world of mineral enemas too!

Dr. Fritz-Albert Popp, a biophysicist and professor at the Kaiserlautern University in Germany, developed a very sophisticated and precise method of determining whether or not a substance is toxic or to what degree it is beneficial to live cells.

This method accurately measures the actual life energy output of these cells. The minerals not only tested completely non-toxic, but increased the cell's life energy output beyond what Dr. Popp had established as his optimum output benchmark.

He congratulated us on the excellence of the product. No other manufacturer of natural colloidal minerals has this test guaranteeing the safety and effectiveness of their product.

http://www.american-longevity.com/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
i]

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Pavel, Come Home
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2007, 11:31:06 PM »
From the website noted in Paul's "press release":

===============================

What, pray tell, is McTaggart's/Dr. Popp's definition of "significant change?"  Is it statistically relevant?  Since this was just the pilot experiment, and perhaps numbers were not even kept, I proceeded to the experiemental results page, hoping to find more data.[/color]

===============================

[url=http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/the_results.htm]The little leaf that glowed

In March and April of this year, we began our large-scale computer experiments, with Dr. Schwartz's University of Arizona team. Unlike our experiment with Dr. Popp, we decided to have a target plus an identical control. The scientists would not be told which target we’d sent intention to until after they'd analyzed the results.

Our first experiment was carried out at a London Conference on March 11, where 400 of our attendees sent intention to increase the light emissions of a geranium leaf at the University of Arizona. Our intention was to make the leaf 'glow and glow'.

The results were highly significant, compared to the control — so much so that the difference can be seen on photographs taken by the lab's special CCD imaging systems.
 
Technical glitches

Our biggest challenge so far has been technological. Our intention experiments require that thousands of people stare at the same image of the target on our website at the same time. Ordinarily, this is extremely expensive, requiring many servers linked together to cope with the web traffic.

In our early experiments, we also use a 'live' webcam or continually refreshed image of the target. This also requires extra server capacity to enable thousands to see the same image at once.

Our challenge has been to find an affordable computer system sophisticated enough to cope with thousands of people around the world staring at the target image on the same computer page all at the same time.

On March 24 we attempted to replicate our first experiment, asking people around the world to send intention via our internet site.

Some 10,000 people attempted to participate in the experiment. Our system could not cope with that many participants all trying to access the system at the same moment, and the website crashed.

It became clear to us that we needed web experts to cope with this challenge and extra server capacity.

Team of web experts

We hired a team of web engineers, who carefully designed the experiment to enable the pages to show continually refreshed photographs of the target on the website.

We also rented server space from a company that supplies the servers for Pop Idol, the British equivalent of American Idol. For the next experiments, we had nine linked servers, which could have coped with traffic of one million visitors.

Glowing seeds, too

On April 14, we ran our next web-based experiment. The target this time was stringbean seeds, and again the intention was to make them glow. Nearly 7000 participants from 30 countries around the world participated and the technology worked perfectly,
The bean experiment was showed a strong 'glow effect', but not in terms of statistical significance — largely because of the limitations of our imaging equipment.

According to Dr. Schwartz: "The beans were in the predicted direction, but the results did not reach statistical significance. However, there were only 12 beans per condition (glow versus control). If it was possible to image twice as many beans, the results would have reached statistical significance (this is called power analysis in statistics)."

In other words, we showed a large effect, but we needed more seeds to satisfy the scientific definition of 'significant'.

More technical hitches

A repeat of our leaf experiment a week later also experienced technical problems so that only 500 people managed to log on.

According to Dr. Schwartz, 'The final leaf experiment showed little effect. Less than 1/6th the number of people who participated in the bean experiment participated in the leaf experiment, so the results are inconclusive.'

We began working with Nick Haenen, a web developer in the Netherlands, who is working in technology that gives us access to 500 linked servers— and now at low cost. In addition, a team of computer experts from a variety of Dutch computer companies have offered to donate their time to our project to assist in any other technological issues.

Our technical problems appear to be solved.

So, what have we learned so far?
  • Intention sent non-locally by a group of at least 400 appears to have a significant effect on distant targets
  • A group of more than 6000 people sending intention from remote sites creates a significant effect, and is as large as 400 people in the same room.
  • For intention to work in a scattered group, we may need to have a critical mass of more than 1000 people.
  • Computer distractions or problems interfere with intention.

===============================

Still no hard data.  This is a real problem for me.  If these results are so "significant," why aren't they sharing the numbers?  I'd like to make up my own mind whether they are significant or not.  I'd like to punch the numbers into my calculator and see if I agree that they are statistically relevant.  I'd like to take a look at the parameters of their experiment to check whether their N is big enough and whether they have all the controls that I think should be there.  Why don't they share?

Hate to say it, but these "experiments" sound an awful lot like what the Ramsters are doing in Washington, wandering 'round trying to read each other's minds from across a field...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------