Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA

Another Sue spam blog?

<< < (2/4) > >>

Anonymous:
Seems Scheff is still blogging away about Whitmore in addition to these Carey blogs of hers.  Wonder when she's gonna get around to creating a blog about the lawsuit filed against her and PURE, Focal Point Academy, etc?   :roll:

Monday, September 10, 2007
Another side to the Whitmore Academy, and most say the only side.....

http://thewhitmoreacademy.blogspot.com/

Joyce Harris:
I must be special; Sue Scheff has added my name under "LABELS" right between the names Cherly Sudweeks and Mark Sudweeks on this updated disgraceful Whitmore Blog of hers!

Scheff never has answered the question:
Where did she get the pictures of the Whitmore students she has posted on this blog?
Students who were victims in the criminal case against Cheryl Sudweeks are featured in these photos on her blog; and it is my understanding that the victims and their parents did not give permission for their children's pictures to be featured in this blog.

Joyce Harris:
It's interesting that Scheff continues to update her Whitmore Academy blog since this facility is closed.  Why continue to BLOG and promote a defunct facility that closed amid abuse allegations and a criminal case against the owner; especially while a civil case is ongoing?

Since Scheff seems to enjoy blogging about what she considers "secrets" and the personal lives of others - wonder why she doesn't BLOG about a facility that is open for business; one she reportedly refers parents and their children to; one where her own daughter and new son-in-law reportedly work as counselors?

Surely, Scheff's blogging reading public would have more interest in reading her views  about Harbor Oaks Boarding School ; and reading more about her daughter and son-in-laws new jobs at Harbor Oaks Boarding School( if they still work there)---than reading about some closed down facility in Nephi, Utah !

Does Sue Scheff avoid writing, blogging about her daughter and son-in-law working at this facility - because there might be some conflict of interest to have her daughter working at the same facility that Scheff/PURE reportedly refers many children to?
Just asking, since a topic has been posted that asks if Harbor Oaks Boarding School is Sue Scheff's new "cash cow?"  I certainly wouldn't know.

Perhaps Scheff can give insight into how one goes from Gymnastic coach, stunt graduate to "teen counselor at a boarding school" that supposedly Scheff/PURE recommends to parents and their children.

Perhaps Scheff could BLOG about another facility that is currently open for business that she should possibly know about - Focal Point Academy in NV - rather than spending so much blogging time on the defunct Whitmore Academy?

Another topic of interest that Scheff might could address in her BLOGGING could be an explanation  of why Isabelle Zehnder took her off CAICA's "Advocate of the Month" list.
 Perhaps Scheff could update her "Sue Scheff - All About Me" and explain it there?  
When other people have titles ripped away from them - don't they usually make a public statement and explain WHY?  When public figures like Miss America, or Miss USA lose their "titles" there's usually a public explanation.
Why did Sue Scheff lose her title of "CAICA Advocate of the Month?"

Or, if Scheff really just enjoys writing BLOGS about "secrets, and people's personal lives" - perhaps she could write a BLOG from her own personal life experiences:
Maybe Scheff could BLOG about abusive "boyfriends" and what it's like for a relationship to spiral out-of-control to the point of filing domestic violence and taking the guy -friend to court, etc - as stated in all those public documents posted.
OR, perhaps Scheff could BLOG about the effects of an "alcoholic, non-suporive ex-husband" which has been reported; and gossiped about - if any of that is true.

It really does seem Scheff has an array of things in her own personal life she can draw upon to BLOG about that might be more interesting than me.
She's been pounding on my "personal secretive life" a couple of years now - and doesn't seem to understand - it's old, old news; and the shock value wore off when the Fornits topic "Joyce is a Slut Woman" was posted.

The fact remains:
I don't claim to be "an advocate;" I don't refer children to programs; I don't run a facility for chldren.

 

.

Joyce Harris:
Scheff states in the Whitmore blog, "I have visited the Whitmore Academy and Mansion on several occasions."
Scheff also indicated to me in 2004 that she had visited Whitmore Academy in person.
Scheff's testimony in the PURE vs WWASP transcripts seem to indicate something different:

Sue Scheff gave testimony in the WWASP vs PURE trial.
On page 98 of the transcript, reference was made to paragraph three of an Affidavit that was signed by Sue Scheff, and filed on February 16, 2002.

Question:
"You never resided in the State of Utah and you had only made one visit to Utah as a tourist ten year previously.
Was that a true statement when you made it?"

Answer by Sue Scheff:
"Yes it was when I made it."

After reading this testimony by Sue Scheff; which I assume it TRUE;
I begin to wonder, and ask:.
.
If Sue Scheff had not even been in the State of Utah since "ten year previously to the year 2002,:" this would mean that Scheff had not been to Utah since 1992.

We were referred to Whitmore Academy by Sue Scheff in October 2004.
Why did Sue Scheff lie to me when she said she had personally visited Whitmore Academy? Whitmore Academy was not in existence in 1992.
Sue Scheff said to me: "when she walked through the doors of Whitmore Academy, she could feel the love."
Scheff also wrote that "Cherly Sudweeks's smile could light up a room."

Why would Sue Scheff say these things about a personal visit to Whitmore Academy, if she had not actually visited the facility?

I assume her testimony in the WWASP vs PURE trial was true.

Joyce Harris:
Since Sue Scheff has updated, her Whitmore blog and added my name to it - I wanted to re-address another issue that Scheff  wrote about me in her blog:

 Sue Scheff wrote in her Whitmore Blog:
"No matter what it is/was;, all of this led to a civil case instigated by this mother."

Scheff is incorrect: The lawfirm representing the Whitmore parents in the civil case against the Sudweeks/Whitmore--HOWARD, LEWIS, & PETERSON -- was initially hired by the parents of the student who first alleged he was abused by the Sudweeks in November 2004 as reported by KLS TV in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Samanatha Hayes Reported on November 30, 2004
"A Troubled Teen Home Investigated for Abuse"
"A facility for troubled teens is under investigation tonight after strong allegations from one boy.
Carol Sisco, Child & Family Services: Our licensing office notified them we intend to revoke their license."
http://tv.ksl.com?index.php?sid=136013&nid=5

Scheff blog continues:
"What a mess - in the end - the most beautiful program to help families is closed, since it has to handle the legal mess this mother caused, in my opinion."

The Sudweeks did continue to have "legal problems" but I did not cause them.

Kristen Stewart's report in the Salt Lake City Tribune, "Boarding School: she stands accused of child abuse and hazing at now defunct treatment center." on June 11, 2005.
Cheryl Sudweeks was charged with 5 counts of child abuse and 2 counts of hazing against 4 Whitmore students.

Jared Eldridge, the County Attorney did not bring any charges on behalf of my daughter.
I am not privy to why the State of Utah removed the Sudweeks's license to operate Whitmore Academy. Ask them!
http://www.isaccorp.org/whitmore/whitmo ... 11.05.html

On September 22, 2006 Linda Thomson's report in the Deseret Morning News, "Plea deal for ex-school operator" reports Cheryl Sudweeks's plea bargain, in which she agreed to not operate a facility in Juab County "for the rest of her life."
In explaining this plea bargain, County Attorney, Jared Eldridge says: "These kids made some allegations of abuse, and I completely believed them. That's why I filed the case."

Again: I had nothing to do with this plea agreement. Why did Cheryl Sudweeks accept a plea bargain, instead of going to trial to prove the innocence she seems/wants to claim? I don't know. ASK HER!

I have no idea WHY or WHEN the Sudweeks decided to close the Whitmore Academy. Again---ASK THEM!!!

Summary: I did not initiate the civil case against the Sudweeks.
ANYONE who says I paid any parents to join this civil case is a LIAR. Anyone who says I paid any parent, or any child/student to lie about the Sudweeks is a LIAR.
My family was not a part of the criminal case against the Sudweeks. My family is not a part of the civil case against the Sudweeks/Whitmore Academy.

NOTE: I had never heard of the Sudweeks in 2001 when Mark Sudweeks was involved in his FELONY Animal Abuse case in Canada: Regina VS Sudweeks; and when the Sudweeks were evicted from Mexico for operating a school without a license.

So: hopefully Sue Scheff will not try to blame these legal problems of the Sudweeks had in these 2 countries on me, too "in her opinion.".

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page