I love what he says about the "referral sources" putting the matter in the past. Let those "referral sources" keep sending kids there and see how fast their butts get hauled into court.
Why would anyone go to court for referring? Sounds like thewhole thing was thrown out.
No, no, no, friend. Not at all. If the email is true, it was dismissed without prejudice meaning it can be brought again.
Now, let me educate you from in insider's perspective. By the time the "agreement in principle" to settle had been drafted, the plaintiffs were demanding a trial and no settlement. This actually furthers the goals of plaintiffs and opens HLA to much more legal jeopardy; to wit dozens of individual lawsuits and a new class action more widely drawn including abuse and neglect in addition to fraud.
This, although spun as positive by Len, is a disaster for HLA who can now not "get off the hook" without admission of wrongdoing and a meager class settlement.
Now Len will face numerous individual lawsuits for millions of dollars which he will have to pay to defend individually - each and every one. One or more will likely be successful and include admission of wrondoing and hefty penalties for injuries and punitive damages.
This is the nightmare scenario Len was looking to avoid. In my opinion, this is the final nail in the coffin for HLA. David Sullivan, if you're legitimate, you should smell the blood in the water right now...