Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Split: Who's Back to Derailing Threads
Anne Bonney:
So he can't really be banned even if every single Fornits poster agreed to it, correct? Proxys and all, right? I'm for bannination, but is it realistic? I don't know.
So, Mods & Admins......just tag his posts with some icon/picture or whatever you want :wink: :wink: (that should be fun, finding Who's own personally chosen avatar), but TAG them only. Nobody alters or edits anything in any way.
And tag all his previous alter-ego posts. It's the only way anyone can get a clear picture of who this guy is. If we can't ban him because of proxys, would this be acceptable?
psy:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Last three posts = same person.
--- End quote ---
I think the whole thread is one person. go back and read it. Although they do have a good point, I must admit.
::hatter::
--- End quote ---
Do you GET IT NOW!!!!
That post came from TheWho, and it's about the most accurate statement he has ever made on the forum.
psy:
--- Quote from: ""Anne Bonney"" ---So he can't really be banned even if every single Fornits poster agreed to it, correct? Proxys and all, right? I'm for bannination, but is it realistic? I don't know.
So, Mods & Admins......just tag his posts with some icon/picture or whatever you want :wink: :wink: (that should be fun, finding Who's own personally chosen avatar), but TAG them only. Nobody alters or edits anything in any way.
And tag all his previous alter-ego posts. It's the only way anyone can get a clear picture of who this guy is. If we can't ban him because of proxys, would this be acceptable?
--- End quote ---
I don't think ginger would have a problem in the HLA forum but I doubt she wants his posts outed everwhere. The guy posted an almost superhuman number of posts. Its like he was paid to do it. Tagging each and every single TheWho post manually would be pointless.
It could probably be done in Sql directly on the backend, but why bother... Like you said, he will come back on another connection... *sigh*
Friggin paranoid americans... right....
Well. suffice to say i've tagged the little fucker two or three pages back, but i'm not going to bother further than that... You should get the point ok. End of story. The fucker WAS flooding the forum. Nobody has ever or will ever be banned for an opinion on this forum.
Che Gookin:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Wandering Waygookin"" ---yeah true that you better get on your tin foil hat. Considering that it is the who's postings that may or may not have been altered my give a shit o' meter just went past zero.
--- End quote ---
Yes, me too, I dont give a rats ass myself. But from a readers point ofview if it is happening to thewho, because of his position, we all know it will happen again to the next guy that comes onto fornits and disagrees with everyone or is happening tody and we dont know it. It seems the only way to insure yourvoice gets heard is to agree with the majority.
--- End quote ---
Bullshit. I've been trolling, posting shock site links, and being a total asshole for nearly 2 years.Not only am I more respected than that stupid cunt the who, I've never even come close to being banned.
I've disagreed with people plenty of times on this forum. The voice that gets heard is the voice that is willing to stick it out. The who on the other hand resorts to a variety of totally fucktarded anon postings, personal attacks, and out right denial of service attacks via his flooding to no doubt force up the costs of maintaining this website.
If anything I feel more secure now knowing my voice will be heard and not having it buried under a dump truck full of bogus findings from the Who's bullshit little crack pipe project he called research. Mind you I have to wade through a slew of sue scheff posts, but at least those have some sort of redeeming value. The who's evidence on the other hand, along with the rest of his postings, look to have been cooked up by himself whilst sitting on the shitter smoking an 8 ball of crack.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""psy"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""psy"" ---Done talking to yourself???? lol.. ooh.. wait. You ARE done talking to yourself. Bye bye now. Take care!
::both::
xxx.xx.xxx.xxx = [ 42 Posts ]
xxx.xx.xxx.* = [ FUCKLOAD ]
--- End quote ---
tsk,tsk,tsk you should be ashamed. You never even checked to see if the guy was banned for flooding.
and you say you believe in free speech. You are giving us your definition and you are blinded like the others. He was banned for what he believed in and you know it not for flooding...... the wording of his posts were altered and Deborah knows it.
check it out
--- End quote ---
Listen. Go back through the thread in about 30 mins and see all the little cats in the hats. It WAS the who. cut it out. I have looked. Don't be an idiot, the guy is a just another program con artist.
If you know a little about networking you'd realize why I banned the whole range. Dialup ISPs often assign a new IP addy per connection. Tha 42 posts? that was PER FUCKING CONNECTION !!! Do I really need to elaborate. The guy is a liar and he WAS flooding the forum.
--- End quote ---
Of course I was flooding !! I was trying to get your attention. You asked if thewho would agree at having his posts strung together and I responded that he said it was okay. I cant pm you......
You go on and on about free speech and you dont realize thewho was banned for something he didnt do. Yes he posted as a guest and was involved in flame wars but he didnt flood the forum.
Any other frequent poster would have been warned.
He was banned because he exposed that the moderators change peoples posts ans the wording. They also delete posts they dont agree with so the readers get their spin on things... do you get it now!!!!
Fuck, psy, wake up.... ban all my IP's if you like...but if you want the truth dont just close your eyes and ears
::hatter::
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version