Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Split: Who's Back to Derailing Threads
TheWho:
I dont expect to win this argument here on fornits against the mods. I think we all know the outcome.
I think if you did look into it (unbiased) you will see I am right. If not maybe my information will change things for the better when the next guy comes along who disagrees with the majority and his posts are left for all to read and judge for themselves. I am not trying to bash fornits, but it isnt good to have this happen to posters, whether it is adding a man ina hat or altering posts. The readers have a right to know all views are represented without alteration.
Just rethink what i have said and compare how thewho was treated vs. someone who was against programs and waving a different flag. He might have gotten some time off but not silenced for good without a warning or day in court.
::hatter::
psy:
Well. If you can get permisssion from the who to make ALL his postings available to the public, then we might be able to work something out. If TheWho truly wants the truth to be known, fine by me.
He was NOT banned for what he did in a few minutes, either. I don't know who you are getting your information from.
As for labeling a FEW of his MANY posts with a cat in the hat, I agree with you that it was wrong. He should have just been banned and left it at that.
Hey. I don't like the idea of keeping all this secret either, but Ginger has a strict policy of not outing posts. If the Who waives that, in the interest of showing that he was not flooding the forum, fine, but he won't do it. Figure out for yourself why.
Che Gookin:
The argument seems to have drifted to being less about what the Who did or didn't do and more about what could potentially happen in the future. I agree alternations of posts should not be happening and this entire episode should prove to be a good example of why not to alter posts.
TheWho:
--- Quote from: ""psy"" ---Well. If you can get permisssion from the who to make ALL his postings available to the public, then we might be able to work something out. If TheWho truly wants the truth to be known, fine by me.
He was NOT banned for what he did in a few minutes, either. I don't know who you are getting your information from.
As for labeling a FEW of his MANY posts with a cat in the hat, I agree with you that it was wrong. He should have just been banned and left it at that.
Hey. I don't like the idea of keeping all this secret either, but Ginger has a strict policy of not outing posts. If the Who waives that, in the interest of showing that he was not flooding the forum, fine, but he won't do it. Figure out for yourself why.
--- End quote ---
I am sure thewho would not object to his posts being made public. I will ask him and check in tomorrow.
I think this will take the focus off his posts being altered and deleted and place his anon posts, if he had then, under a microscope. But I believe he has nothing to hide if he is the same person on-line as he is off, he wont object.
::hatter::
Che Gookin:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""psy"" ---Well. If you can get permisssion from the who to make ALL his postings available to the public, then we might be able to work something out. If TheWho truly wants the truth to be known, fine by me.
He was NOT banned for what he did in a few minutes, either. I don't know who you are getting your information from.
As for labeling a FEW of his MANY posts with a cat in the hat, I agree with you that it was wrong. He should have just been banned and left it at that.
Hey. I don't like the idea of keeping all this secret either, but Ginger has a strict policy of not outing posts. If the Who waives that, in the interest of showing that he was not flooding the forum, fine, but he won't do it. Figure out for yourself why.
--- End quote ---
I am sure thewho would not object to his posts being made public. I will ask him and check in tomorrow.
I think this will take the focus off his posts being altered and deleted and place his anon posts, if he had then, under a microscope. But I believe he has nothing to hide if he is the same person on-line as he is off, he wont object.
--- End quote ---
This ought to be hilarious.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version