Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA
Isabelle Zehnder CAICA back up. Notice any changes?
Anonymous:
From: pattiatwoods@hotmail.com
>Subject: Arrangements
>Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 19:32:51 +0000
>
>Hi Patty,
>
>We just got off the phone so you know the person to contact is James.
>His direct number is 435-229-9378. The main number at Sunrise
>Adolescent Transport is 435-673-3202.
>
>The person to contact re the programs is Sue at 954-349-7260. She is
>aware of the situation so just let her know I sent you to her. I
>normally don't give out her direct, home phone number but she said OK.
>She has over 7 years experience helping families so I feel confident
>she'll steer us in the right direction, if we need to go that direction.
>
>Here's a link to my website regarding coaching in case you want to go
>that
>route: www.positivefamilysolutions.com. Please let the family know I am
>available to talk with Jason soon after they pick him up from TB. Often
>it is beneficial for me to talk to the child to let them know what is
>happening and why. The kids trust me once they know who I am and what I do.
>
>If you would like to help CAICA by making a donation, please go to
>www.caica.org and click on the Visa/MasterCard Donate button. We'd
>really appreciate it!
>
>Talk to you soon,
H E L L O, Izzy. You do refer to transport company and PURE!
Anonymous:
On the subject of a few posts back.... here's the quote: "It is important to remember that the troubled child/teen industry, including
transport companies for children and teens, is virtually unregulated, there are
no Federal laws to protect the children. There is no entity looking out for the
safety and well-being of the children that is not financially tied to this industry."
Maybe I am misunderstanding that last sentence, and please correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't a GENUINE 501c3 non-profit organization recognized by the IRS be considered an entity? And, if so, if this entity was NOT financially tied to the industry as implied in the context of that statement, would that be or not be an 'actionable' statement? Off the top of my head, I can think of at least one entity that is not financially tied to the industry and that does a great job of 'looking out for the safety and well-being of children placed in harmful/abusive programs. In fact, it is responsible for hundreds of kids being taken OUT of and prevented from being placed in harms way inside these hellholes. Before going too much further, would someone please comment on that above statement? :question: thank you in advance... 8-)
Anonymous:
I can name an entity that is looking out for the welfare of children in this industry...that is saving children from these programs....and saving children from being placed in these programs.....and, THAT IS NOT TIED FINANCIALLY TO THIS INDUSTRY IN ANY MANNER:
ISAC--International Survivors Action Committee
Anonymous:
Since Izzy appears to be distancing herself from Sue Scheff/PURE; who might Izzy be using to refer parents and children for program placement?
Could Izzy possibly be using Scheff's other long-time "friend and colleague" Marie Peart?
What's the status of PSY's promise to close down CAICA by December?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version