the information seemed to be one sided or tainted like it came from an ex-employee and not worthy to be used to base a decision.
::hatter:: ::soapbox::
could there possibly be a better witness/source than an ex-employee? what makes you think ex-employess would provide biased information?
i dont get it. when some parents read this site, they think anything negative is biased and anything positive about hla is true. in fact, it's quite the opposite. Note how hla has their own forums, which are censored and have only glowing, positive things said about hla and anything with the slightest grain of negativity gets deleted. Fornits on the other hand, although current hla administrators continue to flood this forum with their ilogical and paper-thin defences; we do not ban them. there are issues with some individuals such as "thewho", since he has absolutely no affiliation, connection, or knowledge about hidden lake, which is why measures have been taken against him. the reason many of these pages are filled with vulgarities and personal attacks is because it's a highly emotional topic. keep in mind that many of these posters who are kids, on top of having previous emotional trouble, were psychologically, mentaly, and spiritually abused for 1.5-3 years in the name of "therapy". no wonder the kids are pissed, and no wonder Hidden lake is getting on the defensive [even online], their mistakes are coming to bite them in the ass, there going to be going from middle-class, high reputation to impoverished and shunned. what do you expect? i thought the average individual has common sense, after all, it's callled common sense for a reason.