Author Topic: The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.  (Read 12385 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #75 on: July 15, 2007, 08:38:11 AM »
Quote from: ""Froderik""
It seems this guest has some inside scoop on Niles.


My thoughts exactly. I want dish! Spill it!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline nimdA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1218
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #76 on: July 15, 2007, 11:02:49 AM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Nihilanthic""
The insecurity on part of the MILF is what ruined my last attempt with one who was 36  :(

Interesting in how you automatically blame the other, with total disregard of your part in the relationship's demise.

Actually, Niles, the "MILF" was tiring of your usage of "nigger" in every third sentence, your total disregard for any rational opinion that might challenge your own, and your overall narcissism.  It had little to do with the fact that she had noticed a few more facial lines.

You have to wonder how shallow you must be to be turned off by the common concerns of a woman approaching forty.


Slinging the word "Nigger" around is considered fore play in some parts of the world.














































Like prison.


Niles is that MILF you are talking about or your daddy in prision?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
am the metal pig.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #77 on: July 15, 2007, 02:49:15 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Nihilanthic""
The insecurity on part of the MILF is what ruined my last attempt with one who was 36  :(

Interesting in how you automatically blame the other, with total disregard of your part in the relationship's demise.

Actually, Niles, the "MILF" was tiring of your usage of "nigger" in every third sentence, your total disregard for any rational opinion that might challenge your own, and your overall narcissism.  It had little to do with the fact that she had noticed a few more facial lines.

You have to wonder how shallow you must be to be turned off by the common concerns of a woman approaching forty.


Yeah Niles, it's utterly ridiculous when someone blames the other person for a failed relationship. It takes two. Besides, it was all YOUR fault. ::roflmao::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #78 on: July 16, 2007, 09:49:11 AM »
:roll:  :roll:  :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
The pitfalls of being chronologically buffered.
« Reply #79 on: July 16, 2007, 10:44:13 AM »
Yeah I know.. but I'd say the sardonic, Groucho Marx-like humor was worth a chuckle or two.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »