Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Parents don't want to listen
nimdA:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---I have a different opinion. If ANYHTING he says here is used by a parent to place their child in an abusive program, like HLA or ASR, for example, then it will cause damage to an innocent child for no reason other than we did nothing to stop it.
Let's face facts: He's here solely for the purpose of promoting programs and he posts falsehoods that support his mission.
Why should I allow myself to be his vehicle for the abuse of children?
--- End quote ---
Yourself? Is this Ginger?
Yes, I understood your opinion when you wrote it the first time. That's why I began my response with "I disagree". I still hold the opinion that if we start deleting things we don't like, we're no different than Lon Woodbury trying to control his forum. We all see how well that worked out.
--- End quote ---
hmmmm... this person does make a really good point.
Troll Control:
I think it depends on circumstances. In a fair, level, grounded debate this guy is meat.
HOWEVER, since he doesn't rely on facts or debate thereof, it's only propaganda left behind. Due to the fact that he is already banned and never asked to be reinstated, he should be summarily booted and his drivel removed.
It's not censorship, it's enforcement of TOS rules that we all have to live by except TheWho. He's the one getting special treatment, not "us."
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---I think it depends on circumstances. In a fair, level, grounded debate this guy is meat.
HOWEVER, since he doesn't rely on facts or debate thereof, it's only propaganda left behind. Due to the fact that he is already banned and never asked to be reinstated, he should be summarily booted and his drivel removed.
It's not censorship, it's enforcement of TOS rules that we all have to live by except TheWho. He's the one getting special treatment, not "us."
--- End quote ---
Fine, talk to the owner of the site and see how she feels about it. I've seen her ban one person before (a survivor). She did not remove his postings.
Troll Control:
Also, it has nothing whatsoever to do with "deleting things we don't like" - you miss the point here. It's about an OFFICIALLY& BANNED AND NEVER REINSTATED poster continuing to post.
There's no need even to read what he writes. It should be promptly deleted whenever possible until he expresses contritiion and asks to be reinstated.
The subject matter of the posts is irrelevant and, therefore, by logical extension, whether anyone "likes" the content or not is also irrelevent.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Also, it has nothing whatsoever to do with "deleting things we don't like" - you miss the point here. It's about an OFFICIALLY& BANNED AND NEVER REINSTATED poster continuing to post.
There's no need even to read what he writes. It should be promptly deleted whenever possible until he expresses contritiion and asks to be reinstated.
The subject matter of the posts is irrelevant and, therefore, by logical extension, whether anyone "likes" the content or not is also irrelevent.
--- End quote ---
It's not irrelevant. When there are posts in a thread that are deleted, it makes the thread confusing. If people are only reading responses to The Who's posts and don't see what they're responding to, it makes it very difficult to follow the discussion.
Look, I hate The Who as much as anyone else but banning him won't even work in the first place. All he's got to do is unplug his modem so it generates a new IP or use a proxy. And as I said, he only makes himself look like a big idiot.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version