Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA

Isabelle Zehnder (CAICA) New Front Page Website and Warning

(1/2) > >>

Anonymous:
Izzy has changed the front page of CA-CA- again.
Bottom left corner:
Board of Directors
Editorial Board
NPC Committee
Research Committee
Parent Committee

Above this list is link to : "INTERNET DEFAMATION"
Wonder if Izzy and her friend, Sue have read this one?
It certainly seems Izzy spends a lot of time warning people about defamation, doesn't it?

Best get those disclaimers ready, posters---seems like disclaimers may be needed, I hear; and that's MY OPINION; or that's what I've been told; but it may not be true; but it seems so; according to what everyone says; if that's true, by the way; but that's just HEARSAY.

DOES IT APPEAR THAT IZZY IS RE-INVENTING HERSELF, again?

Anonymous:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Izzy has changed the front page of CA-CA- again.
Bottom left corner:
Board of Directors
Editorial Board
NPC Committee
Research Committee
Parent Committee

Above this list is link to : "INTERNET DEFAMATION"
Wonder if Izzy and her friend, Sue have read this one?
It certainly seems Izzy spends a lot of time warning people about defamation, doesn't it?

Best get those disclaimers ready, posters---seems like disclaimers may be needed, I hear; and that's MY OPINION; or that's what I've been told; but it may not be true; but it seems so; according to what everyone says; if that's true, by the way; but that's just HEARSAY.

DOES IT APPEAR THAT IZZY IS RE-INVENTING HERSELF, again?
--- End quote ---


Are you saying Izzy is planning to sue somebody?  Or somebody is planning to sue her?

Anonymous:
Nothing there about anybody suing anybody.
Izzy does seem fond of issuing warning about defamation; but Izzy and Sue-Sue don't seem to recognize defamation in their own bloggings; or do they?

Anonymous:
Isn't the purpose of a disclaimer? So you can't be sued?  But Izzy's disclaimer says CAICA isn't for referral to programs which isn't exactly true, by her own admission.  Seems to me these disclaimers may give some bloggers a false sense of security but I'm not a lawyer, just wondering how they work and what their purpose is and what happens when a blogge (such as Sue or Isabelle) cross the line?  Do their disclaimers provide absolute immunity?

ZenAgent:
I've got my disclaimer.  Iz and Sue are trying to intimidate people, their threats are as valid as their defense of Whitmore.  The lawsuit against Carey Bock...well, there are some murky areas concerning past bad blood between the litigants.

Let Scheff try suing a program survivor, or a program parent.  Those two have their backs against the wall and they're lashing out anyway they can.  Considering all the retractions and changes Iz makes, it's obvious she blogs first, thinks later, or maybe her boss Sue yells at her for being stoopid.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page