I'll try to keep this short since my posts tend to look like legal briefs (they bore me some times). Yawn is right RB!
Here are the reasons I don't think Dr. B torched or hired someone to burn the place:
1. Insurance companies don't automatically pay a claim. In fact, they are pretty good at spotting insurance fraud. Any sign of this would delay or prevent payment. It's too much of a risk to wind up having to pay for a new building, a lawyer to defend a case of insurance fraud, and the present attorneys. By the way, the comment about Dr. B skulking aroun in a cat suit was just a joke. It seems as though someone took it too seriously.
2. It's hard to believe an HLA-supporter would try to commit the stupid act of insurance fraud around the same time as graduation. It would be an embarrassment, which isn't needed at this time. I think this was done by an anti-HLA'er (one of the delightful people from Fornits?) who is trying to embarrass HLA and try to close the school since it's still operating.
3. If someone were ridiculously stupid enough to commit insurance fraud, they would torch a building that isn't connected to others to minimize the collateral damage. According to the satellite view, there is one down by the lake, one across from the burned Academic Building, the Cafeteria, or the Gym. This person probably wanted to torch the middle building with the hope of burning the other two buildings on each side and possibly the surrounding forest.
Okay, moron. listen up. The building that burned was one of the oldest buildings on campus. AGAIN, I have been told that it is quite probable that it was not insured. If it was insured, then the insurance company would bring in their own investigators, which would not be good for HLA.
The building was not worth much in itself. The land is worth much more than the building...the value of the land still remains. The financial records, contracts have been reported to be lost in the fire, with a multi-million dollar new administrative building, what were all the records doing
with the mold in the old building? Surely, it wasn't so the administrators would have to take a walk everytime they needed a file. Get real.
No insurance, no private insurance investigators, no insurance money,
all financial records etc. lost( that allegedly were already shredded or put in the 50 gallon drum by the unsuspecting hourly employee). The owner is sad now, the victim of an unexplicable fire.
Ask yourself, is the land worth more than the school? Absolutely.
The owners arrogance (that found him in this mess in the first place)
larger than his ethical values? That is for the reader to decide. But,
one would think now, he would have wished his ethics were more important than lining his pockets.
Would his arrogance allow him to sell the school, close it?
The fire happened, either way. Whether one believes him to have
some culpability or believes him to have no culpability. The fire is
now convenient. The transference from the families as victims to
the owner.
One possible scenario:
Classes will be held in the gym or attempted to be held in the gym.
HLA can then say they did their best.
The entire property is sold for development of whatever. He pays his legal bills, goes off into his twilight years.
Yes, it is a ridiculous idea that someone at HLA would tourch the place the night before graduation.. that is an 'honest' response. but, honestly, reportedly,
HLA has been less than 'honest' over the years.
Regarding insurance, is [ HLA] that stupid? ah, arrogant. Most certainly.
Medical insurance: Signing off on all records, by Dr. B. for insurance
purposes. All children for insurance purposes are labeled ODD.. Ridiculous, yes.. Eliott Spitzer ,then the Attorney Genral for NY State, apparently thought so with a so -called TBS school in NY. the school lost.
Before one opens his /her mouth, like you do, one needs to understand, again,
that you have no clue what really has been transpiring at this school over the years. It is not just 'this' school'.
If the court case is not classed, it just means that the case does not meet the requirements in the Judges mind for classing it. It does not mean that
what occurred, was not reprehensible.
The discovery is still sealed, so you have no iota of facts to back up your outrageous statements. You are a disgrace with flagrant disregard for the children that were hurt under HLA's watch. When you wipe their parents tears or feel an ounce of compassion for what some of the families have been through, then maybe you would find an ouce of humility in your soul.
Then, again, The "H" in HLA does notseemingly stand for humility, but the "A" stands might stand for "arrogance". You are the perfect fit for HLA.