Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA

New Article

<< < (2/2)

ZenAgent:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---http://careybock.blogspot.com/2007/05/carey-bock-levine-served-writ-of.html

Sunday, May 6, 2007
Carey Bock Levine Served Writ of Garnishment of Wages
Update as of May 5th, 2007

Although Mrs. Carey Bock Levine still believes she has done nothing wrong and is attempting to use the First Amendment as a crutch for defaming Sue Scheff, PURE and her family on various forums - a jury found it very differently and awarded Ms. Scheff $11.3 Million dollars - $5M of it for punitive damages.

There are no issues to appeal, although Mrs. Bock-Levine will attempt to lead people to this belief. Please take a moment to read the previous posts here to see the inconsistency of Mrs. Bock Levines excuses. Even stooping as low to claim she was a Katrina Victim yet she sold her house 4 weeks prior the horrific hurricane. Furthermore lived in a lovely gated apartment community in League City, TX.

Before you believe the First Amendment supports defamation and slander, please take a moment to read these details.
--- End quote ---


Hey, at least Carey will be aware of the court date this time.  How convenient for Sue the first time that Carey was in the process of moving.

Before you believe you can use the Bock case as a shield against criticism, consider that not all allegations made in these forums are untrue.  Someone might be spoiling for a person like Scheff to file a lawsuit to use the resulting publicity and outcome from the case to shut down PURE.

Scheff should know about posting anonymously on forums, she did it often enough on StrugglingTeens, causing Lon Woodbury to be dragged into the WWASP lawsuit.  

Instant Karma's going to get you.  And remember:

Disclaimer: This post does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained in this post. The information in this post is based on interviews with victims and parents, information from government officials, and lawyers. None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this post in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information contained in this post. All information provided using this post is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

We'll do it your way...

Anonymous:
Sue Scheff's blog, "Carey Bock Levine Served Writ of Garnishment of Wages" certainly gives the impression that Carey Bock has been legally served some type of legal papers/documents.

IF Carey Bock has not, in fact, been served a Writ of Garnishment of Wages; is Sue Scheff protected by her "DISCLAIMER" for posting what certainly would appear to be a bold-face lie?
IF Sue Scheff is posting lies in these BLOGS she keeps cranking out (not calling her a liar, just asking a hypotheical question):
What could be Sheff's defensive for writing them?

Scheff's exact testimony can be read in the WWASP vs PURE transcripts.

Surely, it won't be Scheff's same weak defense in the WWASP vs PURE transcripts:   when Scheff was confronted for her LIES about having a college degree; her LIES about her "medical background;" and her LIES about having psychologists and attorneys on the PURE staff:
 
Scheff's defense in WWASP vs PURE transcipts for these LIES seem to be along the line of, "Oh, I didn't write that  biographical stuff on my webpage; and I seldom read it, so I didn't realize someone else wrote all those misrepresentations about me."  (These are not Scheff's exact words from the testimony, just the overall interpretation of her explanation for the LIES posted on her website----don't call your lawyer, OK Sue-Sue?)

IF Scheff is confronted in court about any possible LIES in these many BLOGS she is postings---will she have some "mysterious blog writer" to blame?

 .

Nihilanthic:
I like how she openly admits that the actions of her critics actually work.

 :rofl:

IMAGINE THAT! THIS SHIT WORKS!

We're actually warning people and making them THINK and be CRITICAL! Thats SO WRONG!

CLEARLY SHE SHOULD SUE US FOR EDUCATING PEOPLE!

 :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page