Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA

LOL

<< < (2/3) > >>

Anonymous:
What would be the purpose of Sue Scheff flooding the internet with Blogs that bring out negative attention to her?
The Whitmore Blog, for example: ; which bashes parents Scheff referred to Whitmore; praises this closed facility and the owner, Cheryl Sudweeks, who accepted a plea bargain in the criminal case against her? Scheff quotes information in this blog that is simply untrue.

The Carey Brok blog is another example. Scheff continues to brag about the judgment--yet she fails to mention the court/appeal process that is ongoing at the time she writes this blog.
What's that about?

In both these examples--what Scheff "doesn't write about" speaks volumes.
In the Whitmore Blog Scheff "doesn't write about" Mark Sudweeks' felony conviction in Canada, or the ongoing civil case against the Sudweeks.
In the Carey Bock Blog, Scheff "doesn't write about" Carey Bock's appeal, or the possiblility that there may be another trial.

Why?
Scheff may be flooding the internet, but it appears that she is generating much discussion that doesn't seem to have a positive effect on her reputation IMO.

BuzzKill:
I think the point is to improve the effect of a Google search on her name - or that of her company  PURE ; Parents Universal Resource Experts.

If she can flood the web with sites of her own making - telling only what she wants told - then when somebody tries to do a search they will only find these sites - unless they check out page two or three - and many don't bother.

Still, it seems to me that all these blogs and web pages might raise an eye brow or two - making one wonder what it this all about. Its kind of weird. It might make them look past al the SS sites, dismissing them as grandiose self promotion, and bring them straight to Fornits.

Anonymous:
LOL ?
Is it really funny that a "reputation defender" company can be hired to clean up someone's reputation, and not allow the public access to valid criticisms that are documented by court records; and Sue Scheff's own testimony?
Yet, the public is flooded with "hearsay, gossipy, blogs filled with vicious mistruths" which both BLOGGERS, Scheff and Zehnder attached disclaimers to protect themselves from the lies they publish.
LOL?
Children are still being referred to dangerous, unsafe, abusive programs for referral fees.
Both Scheff and Zehnder write blogs praising the defunct Whitmore Academy and the owners, Mark and Cheryl Sudweeks; while they parent-bash and publish lies; and withhold information about the criminal past of these two owners in three countries: Canada, Mexico, United States.

LOL?
Don't think so.

Anonymous:
You missed the point.  The point is, it's funny that someones reputation is sooooo bad they need to hire a "reputation defender."

FROM LOL

Anonymous:
Yeah, not to mention the duplicious blog topics being posted by both Scheff and Zehnder seemingly with the speed of an airborne disease.

I mean come on.  Don't either of these women have any other interests other than writing about THEMSELVES?

 :rofl:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page