Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
The Curious Posting Patterns of Billy Procida
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---Sometimes the pizza boy is a spy and he only half knows it. Those are the best kind. That somewhat murky ethical grey area is easily avoided by the shine of those glistening ripe strawberries... And most importantly, they sure do aim to please...
I harbor no ill will towards Billy. He strikes me as a well-meaning, earnest sort. It is the backdrop that I find less than picturesque.
--- End quote ---
Bear,
You seem like a good guy, but too melodramatic. You are not a terrorist and Hyde is not the CIA. No spies, no assassinations. May Hyde be as unimportant to you as you are to them.
Mike
Ursus:
Ah, Mike... Who is being melodramatic here? No one said anything about assassinations, at least not physical ones. You have tried to apply one of the more commonly used "Informal Fallacies" in Logic: Try to discredit an opposing viewpoint by exaggerating it. Have you been studying presidential campaign speeches lately?
I felt that it was important that this issue was aired, for immediate as well as preemptive concerns. Whether you get it now, soon, later, or never, or whether anyone else does, for that matter... it's really not a whole lot of sweat off my back at this point. Someone had to put the bell around the cat's neck, and I done did that.
The next time somebody trolls you looking for information, you might just hear that "ding ding ding" in the back of your mind and be forewarned. You might also want to spend some time trawling through the Hyde archives here just to get some perspective on precedents in previous years.
Cheers. No hard feelings, but the issue is not so academic for some of us here.
Jesus H Christ:
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---Ah, Mike... Who is being melodramatic here? No one said anything about assassinations, at least not physical ones. You have tried to apply one of the more commonly used "Informal Fallacies" in Logic: Try to discredit an opposing viewpoint by exaggerating it. Have you been studying presidential campaign speeches lately?
I felt that it was important that this issue was aired, for immediate as well as preemptive concerns. Whether you get it now, soon, later, or never, or whether anyone else does, for that matter... it's really not a whole lot of sweat off my back at this point. Someone had to put the bell around the cat's neck, and I done did that.
The next time somebody trolls you looking for information, you might just hear that "ding ding ding" in the back of your mind and be forewarned. You might also want to spend some time trawling through the Hyde archives here just to get some perspective on precedents in previous years.
Cheers. No hard feelings, but the issue is not so academic for some of us here.
--- End quote ---
Thanks for the warning.
As far as Hyde being unimportant, you really can't tell who Mr Bear is. He might be Paul Hurd. He might be a she. Maybe he is Ms Grant. Maybe he is Gigi.
I see it as a save the whales kind of thing. Everyone needs a hobby. Mr Bear's is anti hyde posting. To each thier own.
I think we should have a Mansion Levitation day.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---Ah, Mike... Who is being melodramatic here? No one said anything about assassinations, at least not physical ones. You have tried to apply one of the more commonly used "Informal Fallacies" in Logic: Try to discredit an opposing viewpoint by exaggerating it. Have you been studying presidential campaign speeches lately?
I felt that it was important that this issue was aired, for the immediate as well as preemptive concerns. Whether you get it now, soon, later, or never, or whether anyone else does, for that matter... it's really not a whole lot of sweat off my back at this point. Someone had to put the bell around the cat's neck, and I done did that.
The next time somebody trolls you looking for information, you might just hear that "ding ding ding" in the back of your mind and be forewarned. You might also want to spend some time trawling through the Hyde archives here just to get some perspective on precedents in previous years.
Cheers. No hard feelings, but it's not so academic for some of us here.
--- End quote ---
Ursus,
Hyde can identify me if they care to. No harm, bodily or otherwise, has come to me. Emil posted his e-mail address here. No harm has come to him. There are several other people who are identifiable. No harm has come to them. So you're doing a satisfactory job of discrediting your own viewpoint. Trouble is, you're discrediting this entire forum, to the extent that you dominate it. The thought likewise occurred to me that you might be Billy.
Mike
Jesus H Christ:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---Ah, Mike... Who is being melodramatic here? No one said anything about assassinations, at least not physical ones. You have tried to apply one of the more commonly used "Informal Fallacies" in Logic: Try to discredit an opposing viewpoint by exaggerating it. Have you been studying presidential campaign speeches lately?
I felt that it was important that this issue was aired, for the immediate as well as preemptive concerns. Whether you get it now, soon, later, or never, or whether anyone else does, for that matter... it's really not a whole lot of sweat off my back at this point. Someone had to put the bell around the cat's neck, and I done did that.
The next time somebody trolls you looking for information, you might just hear that "ding ding ding" in the back of your mind and be forewarned. You might also want to spend some time trawling through the Hyde archives here just to get some perspective on precedents in previous years.
Cheers. No hard feelings, but it's not so academic for some of us here.
--- End quote ---
Ursus,
Hyde can identify me if they care to. No harm, bodily or otherwise, has come to me. Emil posted his e-mail address here. No harm has come to him. There are several other people who are identifiable. No harm has come to them. So you're doing a satisfactory job of discrediting your own viewpoint. Trouble is, you're discrediting this entire forum, to the extent that you dominate it. The thought likewise occurred to me that you might be Billy.
Mike
--- End quote ---
Mike,
You could be Ursus and Billy. I could be you and I am having this conversation with myself.
I am the Walrus.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version