Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > News Items

AARC website

<< < (5/6) > >>

ajax13:
Once again, a complete absence of facts contrary to those raised about AARC.   Curiously another random stranger who happens to come across this site and attempts to criticize someone pointing to the problem of AARC, but without addressing any facts.  Thanks random stranger for the great investigative work!  If a judge sends a kid to AARC, then it must be safe to put children in the homes of other child drug-abusers and to put the new-comers at the mercy of old-comers.  Problem solved!  And also, if a judge sends a child to AARC, then it doesn't matter that Mr. Doctorvause's training in adolescent drug-intervention came from V.M. Newton at Kids, and that he brought children from Kids into AARC to peer counsel.  And it doesn't matter that AARC takes in millions of dollars to run a day facility staffed by ex-inmates and a guy who took phys. ed. and history in university.  As long as somebody has convinced a judge to send kids there, it must be a-ok.  I have always depended on the kindness of random strangers who do not have any interest in AARC.

Hamiltonf:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---I came across this site and noticed mostly negative comment so I tried to do some investigation into your allegations of AARC's criminal misconduct ajax. I am not for or against just looking for healthy debate of which you do not seem to be prepared to engage in. You seem to have a lot of consuming anger so good luck with that. Your final comments indicate the last vestiges of someone without a strength-based argument...name calling. Won't be back...almost all here aren't interested in making change just venting.
--- End quote ---


Don't worry Ajax, this post is typical of the sort of thing supporters of AARC will say having "just come across" this site for the umpteenth time.  The condescending tone is evident, They're not going to bother coming back to this site because (they say) it's not worth the bother.  Yet they keep coming back and saying the same thing hoping that their "spin" will discourage critics.  

But hey, " you can fool some of the people ....."etc.  

That they are attempting to spread their pernicious influence into BC is not likely to be very successful.  BC ers are much too smart for their crap.

ajax13:
Just to clarify for the next random stranger who happens to come across this forum (but has nothing to do with AARC) and makes a rather pathetic threat about libel, there is not much room to debate.  I don't see the pros of an institution run by an unqualified person, staffed by unqualified people, using discredited methods derived from a defamed church to treat children in an unsafe setting and acquiring millions of dollars from private and public sources that disappear, and which produces a  bunch of badly damaged kids.  But then maybe there is an upside to those facts that I just can't appreciate.  
P.S. Can anybody explain how Mr. Doctorvause, who calls drug abuse a brain disease and is not a medical doctor, feels qualified, with the assistance of course of the emminent non-physicians Lirenman, Campbell and Brown, to treat this disease?

sick of child torture girl:
ajax, the nice thing about cult member is that when they have to deal with educated, inteligent, non-broken children like yourself who have access to information they  cant handle it. They have very little they can say.

Their abuse, their lack of any qualifications while practicing "medcine", is something they manage to get away with only by sheer gall, bribery, complacency, and brutality. In fact, the intensitiy of that evil actually helps them onward. That unthinkable quality of cruelty was the reason no one beleived the Nazis were slaughtering of the Jews for so long.
 If you scrtinize their absurd claims they falls away like cards.-and they know it. .
thank you for coming  helping out with your freind. We need more people like you.

Anonymous:
Miller Newton made numerous claims of success utilizing his treatment methods.  The claims were simply made up. They were all lies.  There is nothing to indicate that any program on which aarc's methods are based had any history of success so the claims of success by aarc, particularly anecdotal claims from former patients, must be viewed with skepticism.  A real study- that focuses on what was actually going on in the lives of patients before they were placed in aarc- and follows everyone who entered aarc for many years is needed.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page