Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA

SUE SCHEFF AND HER WHITMORE BLOG

<< < (6/6)

Anonymous:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---If the Judge in the Whitmore civil case has ordered all participates in this case that they are not allowed to post on public forums:  
Then why are pictures of the victims in the criminal case against Cheryl Sudweeks posted on Sue Scheff's Whitmore blog?

Where did Sue Scheff get these pictures of "the Whitmore students?"
One would have to assume these pictures were provided to Scheff; along with the information on these blogs---such as the personal information about the Sudweeks: length of time the Sudweeks have been married; the Sudweeks's background information.

Are the Sudweeks actually posting by proxy?
If so, are the Sudweeks in violation of the Judge's orders?
--- End quote ---


Well, if so then shouldn't that be brought to the judge's attention IN A MOTION brought by the plaintiffs?

This blog has been onlne for months, IIRC.

Anonymous:
I think I read somewhere that Sue Scheff isn't exactly computer savvy - which means she probably wouldn't know how to do a blog.  Izzie, on the other hand, seems to create blogs in her sleep, LOLS.

My question:  Is it possible Izzie had a hand in helping Sue Scheff with her Whitmore blog?  At least in terms of entering it into the blog format?  Both the blogs had the same tone and similar pictures and info, right?

Anonymous:
Yea, some of the paragraphs in both Izzy's and Scheff's Whitmore blogs are IDENTICAL: so either Izzy and Scheff got together to write these blogs; or one author wrote them both.
Either way: all the personal information had to come from the Sudweeks; and this is posting by proxy in my opinion---
From what has been said; the Judge has ordered all participants to in the civil case not to post on pulbic forums like fornits: so wonder why these blogs are on the internet in the first place.? Especially when these blogs have pictures of victims in the criminal case, and victims are plaintiffs in this ongoing case.  Sure seems Izzy and Scheff has crossed the line here.

Sandy:
Well, in the numerous phone calls that I had, very stupidly, with Isabelle in the past.... I believe, I remember her DEFENDING the Sudweeks.  Though somehow, the subject of Sue never came up... hmmm...
Totally turned my stomach, even at the time.  I do not have any use for anyone that abuses kids or animals.  That's about the time that I really started wondering about her.  How could anyone DEFEND people that has been CONVICTED of animal abuse and I believe, plead GUILTY in some of the Whitmore charges????  They'll all fry in hell, hopefully!! IMO...... :flame:  :evil:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page