Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy

Latest Suicide Attempt

<< < (5/7) > >>

Anonymous:

--- Quote from: ""happyday7"" ---I agree that it is up to the individual experience of each family. I had a bad experience with HLA. The staff are the ones that are the master manipulators. Lots of parents fall for what they tell them. I was never someone who fell for whatever I heard. I learned by experience how HLA is. How can any child thrive in this negative environment? My child is doing so much better now that he is out of HLA..He was not good at first, however, is doing much better now with our love and support.  :D
--- End quote ---


Families like yours are exactly who I am talking about.  Your family should have been screened out and never enrolled in the first place.  And that is said with absolutely no judgement toward you.  Some families do well in a program and some don't.  My guess is that if you had full disclosure about what happened at HLA you would not have enrolled your child.  Other families see the things that are done at HLA and are all for it.  Some families, far to many in fact, get counselors that are not qualified to work at a TBS and that makes things exremely miserable for everyone.

Programmie-Trans 9000:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Families like yours are exactly who I am talking about.  Your family should have been screened out and never enrolled in the first place.  And that is said with vindictiveness toward you. Some parents think their kids do well in a program and some don't buy into the brainwashing. My guess is that if you had full disclosure about what happened at HLA you would not have enrolled your child, like any other sane person. Other parents see the things that are done at HLA and are all for it being done to their kids, which makes one wonder why they were allowed to have kids int he first place. Some families, almost everybody in fact, get counselors that are sadistic and unqualified, and that makes things extremely miserable for their kids. But not the counselors, of course. They're masturbating.
--- End quote ---


TEXT_REPLACEMENT < 15%

Deborah:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""happyday7"" ---I agree that it is up to the individual experience of each family. I had a bad experience with HLA. The staff are the ones that are the master manipulators. Lots of parents fall for what they tell them. I was never someone who fell for whatever I heard. I learned by experience how HLA is. How can any child thrive in this negative environment? My child is doing so much better now that he is out of HLA..He was not good at first, however, is doing much better now with our love and support.  :D
--- End quote ---

Families like yours are exactly who I am talking about.  Your family should have been screened out and never enrolled in the first place.
--- End quote ---

On what basis, should this family have been "screened out"? Appears they weren't unhappy until after the fact. How do you screen out people who oppose the methods and procedures when they don't know until some time passes, what that entails?


--- Quote ---Some families do well in a program and some don't.  My guess is that if you had full disclosure about what happened at HLA you would not have enrolled your child.  Other families see the things that are done at HLA and are all for it.
--- End quote ---


Full disclosure will never happen in a program, ever. Other families may be fine with what they see, but NO family is aware of everything unless they ask many questions and talk to their child.

Anonymous:
If HLA disclosed their methods and the parents did not agree then they should, at that point, be screened out.  You may be right that a program will never disclose everything.  I think they ought to though if they want to survive in this industry.  

I am not saying it is the families fault for not being screened out.  It is HLA's fault for not having the appropriate measures in place.  Ironically that practice ends up hurting HLA in the long run but more importantly the families.

Troll Control:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---I am simply questioning the validity of the report.  My guess is that any form of self harm would be labeled a suicide attempt by someone who has not been trained to know the difference.  One of the great things about this board is that the people here questions the validity of things.  I whole heartedly agree with people doing that not only to HLA but to anyone else that makes a statement that may not be true, including the LCSO.  If you pick and choose who you question it lessens your argument against HLA because you just look like a disgruntled ex-student/employee/parent with an agenda.  You would be better served seeking the truth instead of building a case.  With all HLA (Len) has done the truth is all you need.
--- End quote ---


Well, I certainly agree with you there.  I think all that need be done is to allow HLA to rise or fall on their own merit.  I think this is happening curently.  

I also believe that the people who have blown the whistle on some very amoral and illegal behavior on HLA's part simply level the playing field with a very powerful player.  It's not the intent to report fabricated information for the purpose of staining HLA's reputation; rather it is exposing the "credibility gap" exposed when one compares real practices with what is disclosed before enrollment.  This is, in my opinion, criminal and tragic.

As I have related to others, all we have to trade is our credibility.  People who are pushing for oversight are exposing serious problems with some of these facilities, and to do that, one must trade in credible information with sources and documentation or one cannot get traction with oversight bodies that are very reluctant to act, even if it is in the public interest to do so.

So it's important to try to wade through some of the hyperbole and get down to the verifiable facts of the matter if you're looking for information here - I think we all can agree on that.  Use the reaction of the oversight agencies as a yardstick to measure how credible the information is.

You have also added value to the conversation and I think everyone appreciates that, too.  I think you hit on the central point of the issue as well - full disclosure.  

HLA is now paying for that, as consumers were unhappy with their product after being sold a bill of goods.  So the public sector is holding HLA accountable in a different way.  

But the benefit of both endeavors (law enforcement activities and civil redress of grievances)  is to force HLA to provide what they advertise and to comply with applicable law.  At least this will be some measure of protection for the kids unfortunate enough to end up there...

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page