I am simply questioning the validity of the report. My guess is that any form of self harm would be labeled a suicide attempt by someone who has not been trained to know the difference. One of the great things about this board is that the people here questions the validity of things. I whole heartedly agree with people doing that not only to HLA but to anyone else that makes a statement that may not be true, including the LCSO. If you pick and choose who you question it lessens your argument against HLA because you just look like a disgruntled ex-student/employee/parent with an agenda. You would be better served seeking the truth instead of building a case. With all HLA (Len) has done the truth is all you need.
Well, I certainly agree with you there. I think all that need be done is to allow HLA to rise or fall on their own merit. I think this is happening curently.
I also believe that the people who have blown the whistle on some very amoral and illegal behavior on HLA's part simply
level the playing field with a very powerful player. It's not the intent to report fabricated information for the purpose of staining HLA's reputation; rather it is exposing the "credibility gap" exposed when one compares real practices with what is disclosed before enrollment. This is, in my opinion, criminal and tragic.
As I have related to others, all we have to trade is our credibility. People who are pushing for oversight are exposing serious problems with some of these facilities, and to do that, one must trade in credible information with sources and documentation or one cannot get traction with oversight bodies that are very reluctant to act, even if it is in the public interest to do so.
So it's important to try to wade through some of the hyperbole and get down to the verifiable facts of the matter if you're looking for information here - I think we all can agree on that. Use the reaction of the oversight agencies as a yardstick to measure how credible the information is.
You have also added value to the conversation and I think everyone appreciates that, too. I think you hit on the central point of the issue as well - full disclosure.
HLA is now paying for that, as consumers were unhappy with their product after being sold a bill of goods. So the public sector is holding HLA accountable in a different way.
But the benefit of both endeavors (law enforcement activities and civil redress of grievances) is to force HLA to provide what they advertise and to comply with applicable law. At least this will be some measure of protection for the kids unfortunate enough to end up there...