I did watch it. I agree that there is a line that shouldn't be crossed. I just don't quite know where that is.
I am not opposed to coercion in therapy. I think some of it is needed- I agree with Anne Hall on that.
That is an absolutely preposterous notion - coerced treatment.
Karen, that is a big load of shit. Remember when you deal with Anne you're dealing with a true-believer in CEDU (sued out of business for abuse/neglect/fraud) that has desires to open her own coercive/abusive CEDU spinoff.
Anne is a very misguided and disturbed person (see her posts here as "Ottawa5") that has no business practicing psychology or even dealing with children in general.
She knows for a fact that her belief system is contraindicative to what she learned in college about the principles of psychology, yet she chooses to ignore decades of scientific research in favor of
research proven ineffective and damaging techniques so that she can make a quick buck by referring kids to unlicensed, unregulated programs. She violates the ethical code that all professionals should uphold on a daily basis.
Steer clear of Amoral Annie from Minnesota. Not only is she dead wrong about coerced treatment, she's a nasty, vile borderline sociopath (again, read her posts here and you will get a window into a very sick mind).