Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA
TB DOCUMENTARY?
Rude Intrusion:
Doesn't take all that much guessing to figure this out with the information now available. Mathieu's post explains things clearly enough, given what is already well known to all. Ask yourselves who is famous for threatening: " trial" or "legal charges" . . . . time and time again? That was also in the film? That is also outrageously self important, self centered and selfish? Difficult and controlling? It isn't Paula Reeves; Nor any of the kids; nor anyone else excepting one very well known personality. Does anyone really need to name the hypocritical bitch?
Oh and BTW, it also isn't WWASPS, because Mathieu says the film was made "for them, but it is not their film". No one would ever say this film was made *for* WWASPS.
Anonymous:
I happen to know both Paula Reeves and Sue Scheff and have for years. Paula tried to warn us about Sue years ago and we ignored her. The Washington DC reporter who got sued by WWASP said it best about Paula when he said "my enemy of my enemy is my friend" and that reporter may have the strongest dislike of Scheff than any of us--if thats possible.
A lot of people got sued because of Sue Scheff and Paula thought it was smarter to stay together to try to defeat WWASP. I think she has just had enough of Scheff like the rest of us.
try another castle:
I have a question:
Whoever these litigious individuals are who are causing problems... does anyone know if they signed a release? Because if so, they have nothing to stand on in a courtroom. I would assume this is the case, so I'm wondering about all of that drama.
Of course, the other, more daunting issue, is finding a distributor.
No luck with my neighbor, unfortunately. Frontline does their own investigations, they don't show the investigations of others.
BuzzKill:
--- Quote from: ""try another castle"" ---I have a question:
Whoever these litigious individuals are who are causing problems... does anyone know if they signed a release? Because if so, they have nothing to stand on in a courtroom. I would assume this is the case, so I'm wondering about all of that drama.
Of course, the other, more daunting issue, is finding a distributor.
No luck with my neighbor, unfortunately. Frontline does their own investigations, they don't show the investigations of others.
--- End quote ---
Well in that case - see if you can get the neighbors help goosing the right person to do this story. I wrote Frontline a couple times - maybe if someone on the inside tells them about it?
As for getting it on the air in the states - I have wondered if some of the language might be the problem. It would be difficult to edit (or bleep) Steven with out really detracting from the emotion he feels and the message he is trying to convey. No way the net works would air it, at least not in prime time. 3 AM maybe. But what about MTV? Or A&E? Court TV? How does one go about presenting the material for consideration? How does the public let it be known they want it seen?
Anonymous:
It's not "they" it's Sue Scheff like Ginger said!
Signed release? This wouldn't matter to Mz. Scheff. This is Sue-sue we're talking about.
I hope the producer or director or whoever gets real and rolls over the beetch.
What is "red panties" gonna do? Bring yet another lawsuit? :rofl:
Scheff is become the comic strip of America like Donald Trump.
--- Quote from: ""try another castle"" ---I have a question:
Whoever these litigious individuals are who are causing problems... does anyone know if they signed a release? Because if so, they have nothing to stand on in a courtroom. I would assume this is the case, so I'm wondering about all of that drama.
Of course, the other, more daunting issue, is finding a distributor.
No luck with my neighbor, unfortunately. Frontline does their own investigations, they don't show the investigations of others.
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version