Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA

ASK ISABELLE

(1/3) > >>

Anonymous:
Seems one of the issues surrounding CAICA is it's lack of transparency on the question of whether it's a non-profit tax exempt organization (aka 501 (c) Corporation)?

Given that CAICA has published material on it's public educational website suggesting that it was a soon-to-be non profit tax-exempt organization (see links below) perhaps this is a question Isabelle Zehnder would not mind answering on a public forum?  

Please note CAICA has filed for tax-exempt status and we await our confirmation letter from the IRS. Donations received in the same tax year as IRS confirmation is received are tax-deductible. The IRS estimated we should receive our tax-exempt status by or before October 2005.

http://web.archive.org/web/200612081835 ... 20clip.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/200612081835 ... ution_Form[1].pdf

Board of Directors:

http://www.caica.org/Brochure%20-%20Mic ... 0final.pdf

Anonymous:
CAICA appears to be a spin-off of another Isabelle Zehnder website called Kids In Captivity.com that went online sometime early last year.

As for it's current status, it appears to me that there is NO board of directors for CAICA.  If there were, I would imagine Zehnder would make this information known to the public by way of providing a link to verify it's IRS status as a nonprofit tax-exempt public charity.

Not sure what happened to cause her to abandon her original intentions. The disclaimer only states that CAICA is not for referrals to treatment programs and is not funded directly or indirectly by treatment programs.  

One thing I did notice is CAICA's new advocate for the month.

Poor Jeff Berryman.   :wink:


It takes a special person who isn't afraid of hard work and heartache to be a true child advocate. - Isabelle Zehnder

Anonymous:
Hey Jeff---Ya'll have good grounds for a defamation lawsuit against Izzy for naming you "advocate of the month."  To be associated with Isabelle Zehnder and CAICA is truly the "kiss of death" for anyone taking you seriously.  You're doomed Jeff.

:skull:                      :skull:

Anonymous:
Well, IZZY does say Jeff is "motivated by pure morale outrage," and goes on to name his co-defendant,

So much for "poor little Jeff" as far as I'm concerned.
oops, that's just my opinion, lawyers!.

Anonymous:
Jeff lost his credibility when he refrained from sending out any of the accounts concerning Whitmore published in the media; or any info concerning the civil case and criminal charges that were brought. Had that been any  program, anywhere, that didn't pay Susan, he would have been all over it.  Apparently Jeff's advocating comes with conditions, and his moral outrage can be tempered by other concerns. Just exactly what those concerns are, one can only guess. But one thing is Chrystal clear, they involve not upsetting the referral diva. Its pitiful, really.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page