Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Who Am I Discovery/Whitmore

Suds Back in Canada? Who's Watching Them Now?

<< < (13/15) > >>

Anonymous:
Understanding the Criminal Process in Utah:

No contest:

A "no contest" plea indicates that, while you are not admitting guilt, you do not dispute the charge. This is preferable to a guilty plea because guilty pleas can be used against you in later civil lawsuits.

http://research.lawyers.com/Utah/Crimin ... -Utah.html

Anonymous:
What is your point?
Jared Eldridge, the prosecutor, got what he wanted:
He got rid of the "bad gal" Cheryl Sudweeks without spending the taxpayer's money for a trial---and this woman is never allowed to run any type of facility in his little county of Juab for the rest of her sorry life. Not bad politics.
Eldridge stated he believed the victims, so this says little about his beliefs in justice for abused children.
Sounds like someone is a bit worried about the Suds recent depositions in the civil case. Might some of the questions come back to haunt them in the civil trial? Shouldn't if they answered all the questions truthfully.

Anonymous:
I'm still curious how "never run another program in THIS COUNTY ever again!" is supposed to mean anything at all.

Anonymous:
Rinse Recycle??? Shall we have the former so called "VICTIMS" that were not abused or mis-treated stand up and have a voice? I bet you a million dollars they and there parents totally outnumber the "abused".  I don't believe for one second that nothing but abuse came from the Sudweeks.  I'm sorry to the families that were burdened by a childs hatred toward life. Not to mention being spit on, pushed around, and called names.  I faced much worse than that in public school and faced far worse atrocities in real-life. I did'nt need to be sent away to deal with those real-life situations.  I think the kids were reaching for help. They had nowhere to go. So why not cause a comotion right? Our parents sent us away right? How else can we get them to realize our disdain? And to the ones that testified that had already been in the Sudweeks' care a year or two prior, I have one question. How much did your mother's offer you out of the settlement?  You settle for nothing.  You got nothing. Thats why this forum exists.  Cut the shit and come to grips with reality.  The Sudweeks conviction was minimal because they were accused of minimal actions that were in real-life minimal. Sometimes things happen for a reason. You parents who are ranting and raving because your kid came home or got arrested during the program and still had a problem should most likely look at yourselves and ponder about, "Where did I go wrong?" versus, "Where did they go wrong?"!!!!                        


Oh, I'm sure I'll have a few DANDY responses to this one.  5 bucks says the word DANDY even appears in at least one of them.

Anonymous:
Who cares if the number of "abused" don't outnumber those who say they weren't abused.
ONE abused child is just ONE TOO MANY.
Child abuse is illigal, and immoral, and just plain wrong.
Cheryl Sudweeks accepted her plea bargain--let her live with it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version