Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA
Sue Scheff Sue Scheff Scheff Sue Scheff Sue Scheff
Anonymous:
The programs Sue Scheff referred to ARE abusive. There is a mother who posts here regularly about her daughter who was abused in a program after being referred by Sue Scheff. You hate WWASPS so much, you are willing to align yourself with anyone who flys the anti-wwasp flag, no matter what their true intentions are. It's selfish to think that kids only get abused in WWASPS programs and then align yourself with a profiteer of troubled families, who refer to other programs which are known to be abusive! If you really want to know the truth read the WWASPS vs. PURE transcript in detail and see what kind of child advocate she really is. I was abused in a WWASPS facility and I am horrified at how she is using program victims horror stories to make money! Not to mention that she was the biggest referer to WWASPS and continued to refer after she took her daughter out! Wake up!
It seems the anti-wwasps advocates who support Sue Scheff and PURE have nothing to say about the revelation in those transcripts that Sue Scheff continued to refer to WWASPS after Sue Scheff took her OWN daughter ASHLYN SCHEFF out claiming Ashlyn Scheff had been abused, or if they have, I haven't seen the posts. I am curious though how they and Sue Scheff defend such actions? It just doesn't make sense, IMO. Anybody have a link to posts from these supporters? I'd like to know what their opinion is.
Thank you.
Back to top Sue Scheff
Anonymous:
BORING .... ::argue:: :roll: ::boohoo:: ::bangin:: ::bigmouth:: :silly:
Anonymous:
What's boring about asking for the truth?
Now what IS BORING is Izzy promoting her friend Sue Scheff as some "Advocate of the month." Now that's boring.
BuzzKill:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---What's boring about asking for the truth?
Now what IS BORING is Izzy promoting her friend Sue Scheff as some "Advocate of the month." Now that's boring.
--- End quote ---
Actually, I thought that was good for a snort and a snicker. What a piece of work :roll:
WWASP kid - I used to be among those who defended Susan. I can assure you, that many who once did, now don't. There was a lot of shocked chatter when those transcripts began making the rounds; and this was also when the allegations concerning the abusive treatment at Whitmore came to light. Luke 8 vs 17
Romans 2 vs 16
Anonymous:
Was looking at the WWASP thread: Several threads have been re-posted that help clarify some of the "Scheff/Bock history"
Several "SCHEFF supporters" posted at one time using their own names--but that doesn't seem to be the case any longer. Wonder why?
You have it correct, WWASP poster: Scheff did refer to WWASP programs after claiming Ashley was abused at that WWASP facility. You'd have to ask her how any "Mom" could do that for money?
And Scheff did continue to refer children to Whitmore during the criminal investigation and after the owner, Cheryl Sudweeks was charged with criminal child abuse. Again, you'd have to ask her why she'd do that for money?
And yet Scheff sues another "MOM" for name-calling on the internet? Something seems way off there, in my opinion. Carey Bock didn't put any children in danger for money, did she?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version