Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy

Charity or Politics?

(1/3) > >>

Troll Control:
There has been quite a bit of talk about HLA's "charitable" donations.  Let's set the record straight on a few facts, as reported by staff.

United Way:  

Len requires that ALL employees donate to this charity.  If an employee declined to contribute, they were pressured by their supervisor in an attempt to bully them into contributing.  If this failed, Len would require that the supervisor donate money in each employee's name under his chain of command to reflect 100% participation.

Employees were also required to buy tickets to the "Gold Party" and were required to work the event.

How about the abuse shelter?  

Well, Len asked the chairperson at the shelter to publicly support him in the Mountain Brook project.  When she declined, Len quit the board and ordered all employees to cease donating time or funds to this charity.

How about the Rainbow Children's Home?  

The director disapproves of Len's homosexual lifestyle, so HLA donations were withheld.

EVERYTHING HLA does is quid pro quo.  Nothing is done out of "charity" or "good will."

I hope this sheds some light on HLA and Len's "altruism."

RobertBruce:
Wow. I guess I was right on the money about that huh?

Funny how that works.....

What are your thoughts Buch?

Anonymous:
Let's not forget the contribution to Ms. Jackson's political campaign and her letter of commendation. Was this quid pro quo?

Troll Control:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Let's not forget the contribution to Ms. Jackson's political campaign and her letter of commendation. Was this quid pro quo?
--- End quote ---


Of course it was.  The only problem is that her election bid failed, so HLA could only reap the benefit of the letter and not policy.

Anonymous:
As an added bonus weren't those contributions paid out of the the Non-Profit side of HLA?

Is that legal?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page