Author Topic: Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school (Read 9737 times)

Anonymous · « **Reply #60 on:** October 31, 2006, 08:00:51 PM »

Sue-Sue, if I were you I would not be concerned about the criminal acts of Lynn Prezfeld if I committed perjury. Martha Stewart did not lie under oath. She only lied to an investigator and attempted to change an email on her secretary's computer.

What you did Sue-Sue with all that lieing under oath and destructing evidence that had been ordered by a federal judge, that will get you way more than 5 months in prison. your in a lot of trouble IMO in your next lawsuit.

Anonymous · « **Reply #61 on:** October 31, 2006, 08:33:40 PM »

There's all this again:
Did Sue Scheff actually "lie under oath?"
If so, What was the lie?
Did Sue Scheff actually "destroy evidence that she was ordered to produce by a Federal Judge?"
If so, What evidence did she destroy?
Is there another LAWSUIT against, or involving Sue Scheff on the horizon?
If so, who is involved, and where will it take place?

Maybe if someone tells IZZY, then perhaps IZZY will issue a Press Release. That's seems to be how IZZY does things, right?

Anonymous · « **Reply #62 on:** November 13, 2006, 02:30:48 PM »

What's going on with this? I'm assuming this trial is going to be in Salt Lake City? Is it? Is there a trial date that has been set? This could go on for years.

Anonymous · « **Reply #63 on:** December 20, 2006, 03:52:03 PM »

Bump

Turley filed a second amended compaint 12-18-06. Apparently they have added quite a few more plaintiffs to the original lawsuit.

http://turleylaw.com/Recent_Filings/200 ... d%2088.pdf

Anonymous · « **Reply #64 on:** December 20, 2006, 04:14:27 PM »

Quote from: ""Guest""

There's all this again:
Did Sue Scheff actually "lie under oath?"
If so, What was the lie?
Did Sue Scheff actually "destroy evidence that she was ordered to produce by a Federal Judge?"
If so, What evidence did she destroy?
Is there another LAWSUIT against, or involving Sue Scheff on the horizon?
If so, who is involved, and where will it take place?

Maybe if someone tells IZZY, then perhaps IZZY will issue a Press Release. That's seems to be how IZZY does things, right?

Can someone give an update on this question over on the PURE/CAICA thread? Thanks!

Anonymous · « **Reply #65 on:** January 02, 2007, 10:20:45 PM »

Question:

Since Henriksen represented Sue Scheff in the WWASP vs PURE case:
Since the WWASP vs PURE court records indicate that Sue Scheff referred children to WWASP programs AFTER she started PURE:

What if some of the children/parents who end up being victims/plaintiffs in this case were actually referred to their WWASP Programs by Sue Scheff /PURE?

Will Sue Scheff /PURE be any part of this lawsuit as a defendant?

IF SO: Does this attorney, Henriksen have any "conflict of interest" in this case since he reprsented Scheff in the past?

It would seem as if the court records of the WWASP vs PURE case would play a big role in this pending case.

Anonymous · « **Reply #66 on:** January 02, 2007, 10:42:52 PM »

Holy Cow, that's a damn good question!

I wonder if there are any parents in the Turley lawsuit who were referred by Scheff and if so, WHEN and what programs are involved?

Fornits
Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora
An open discussion about the troubled parent industry