Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA
SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)
Anonymous:
First of all, Whitmore Academy--with Cheryl Sudweeks at the helm was NEVER in business for any 30 years!
And I, too would like to hear Sue Scheff's defense for continuing to refer children and their parents to Whitmore Academy during the criminal investigation, and after Cheryl Sudweeks was charged with criminal child abuse and hazing of 4 children.
No one is saying WWASP is anything good.
Scheff knew that when she was referring parents and children to WWASP.
But, knowing WWASP is bad, doesn't make Scheff referring to any abusive program OK.
Anonymous:
What lawsuit is Izzy and Sue-SUE helping you with?
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""notstupidlikeyou"" ---Why is it that you all think that Sue is a bad person do you know her personally or do you go on what the media is payed to say by WWASP could you be as stupid to think that WWASP does not have extend power I mean they fund the Utah elections and why is it that you think they still exist because they are helping? nope wrong it's because they make tons of money and pay the right people off to keep helpless Teens and Pre-teens in prison to scam there parents. I will be the first to say I support Sue and Isabelle in there fight I support the Turley law firm in it's movement against WWASP however small it may seem now even greater things shall come from it. ::both::
--- End quote ---
It would be a lot easier to understand your posts if you didn't constantly use run-on sentences moron.
I think Sue is a bad person for continuing to refer parents to programs that are under investigation for abuse. I think she's a bad person for referring parents to programs when abuse charges have actually been filed. Can you explain to me why she did that? Can you explain to me why you don't have a problem with that? ::both:: ::fuckoff::
Anonymous:
Turley Law Firm and their "movement"? It's a law firm, for pete's sake ... not an advocacy or activist group. They are getting paid for their work are they not? Nothing wrong with that, of course, but let's keep it in perspective shall we?
Having said that, I think most people would agree that the true victims of the troubled teen industry racket are the kids. While it's unfortunate the parents feel they were "defauded" --- all they lost was money. Their children lost something that can never be replaced. Any financial reward should go to the children, IMO. They had no say in their abusive treatment and while their parents may claim it was a decision they deeply regret, they should be held accountable for funding the maltreatment of their child. How many of these parents signed away the rights of their own child to talk to them on the phone? Write to them freely (meaning non-censored)? Complain about abusive conditions? I would imagine most of them. What kind of parent does that? Cuts off communication with their own kid until the program says they can? That's just plain nuts. Where's the accountability on the part of parents? It's a tough question I admit but one that needs to be addressed if other parents are going to wise up and realize there are consequences to outsourcing "parenting".
:flame:
Anonymous:
your all crazy if you only knew have of what you think you know you'd be some what smart. hehe lol instead of living you cry and bitch about other smarter and better people than you'll ever be wise up and grow up. Half wits.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version