Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
Hyde School is doing a lot of things right.
MisfitParent:
--- Quote from: ""Anne Bonney"" ---
--- Quote from: ""MisfitParent"" ---
Alas Bonney, I'm afraid it may be too late for you. If you wish knowledge, seek it at the source, don't ask others to do what you can do better yourself. As for attacks, my comments were not intended as such, but it seems you do have a way of inviting them with the way you lash out at visitors to this site.
--- End quote ---
You seem to have appointed yourself spokesperson, so I was asking. What, can't answer the question? If you've got so much faith in Hyde and what they do for kids, what's the problem with asking some questions about how it works?
Where did I lash out at anyone?
--- End quote ---
In no way did I appoint myself spokesperson, but rather I posted an observation and commentary about Hyde and some posters on this website. I'm not in a postion to answer many of these questions, so therefore they need to be addressed elsewhere. I'm not going to spend my time doing your legwork for you. If you want to know, ask someone at Hyde School. Your initial response to my post is as follows:
Why is it that anyone that has any criticism about Hyde is automatically labeled as "misguided" or "angry" or "disgruntled" or "not working their program" or "immature" or "haven't looked at their own issues" or "disturbed" or......well, you see what I'm getting at.
Do you people ever answer for your own behavior? I also notice that you guys go after the easy targets here. Kids (or grown adults now) are angry. They've got a right to be. Some lash out and get a little outrageous here, I've got no problem with it....I get it. But there are also people here who are asking relevant questions and y'all ignore those and always seem to find the time to address the angry posts. What about answering some of the salient questions and concerns that have been posted?
Sounds like a lash to me. I can understand why people would ask you to go away. You probably get comments like that wherever you slither. I'd prefer not to address you anymore, as you're pretty much a waste of time and energy. Thanks for understanding.
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: ""MisfitParent"" ---
In no way did I appoint myself spokesperson, but rather I posted an observation and commentary about Hyde and some posters on this website.
--- End quote ---
Ok, you didn't officially say you were a spokesperson but you sure came on here implying you had a good deal of knowledge about Hyde and I was asking you about it.
--- Quote ---I'm not in a postion to answer many of these questions, so therefore they need to be addressed elsewhere. I'm not going to spend my time doing your legwork for you. If you want to know, ask someone at Hyde School.
--- End quote ---
You are in a position to answer questions about your understanding of how Hyde works. Your impressions and why you feel that way aren't you? I'm not asking for Hyde's explanation, I've read what they have to say. I'm asking you why you feel the way you do.
--- Quote ---Your initial response to my post is as follows:
Why is it that anyone that has any criticism about Hyde is automatically labeled as "misguided" or "angry" or "disgruntled" or "not working their program" or "immature" or "haven't looked at their own issues" or "disturbed" or......well, you see what I'm getting at.
Do you people ever answer for your own behavior? I also notice that you guys go after the easy targets here. Kids (or grown adults now) are angry. They've got a right to be. Some lash out and get a little outrageous here, I've got no problem with it....I get it. But there are also people here who are asking relevant questions and y'all ignore those and always seem to find the time to address the angry posts. What about answering some of the salient questions and concerns that have been posted?
Sounds like a lash to me. I can understand why people would ask you to go away. You probably get comments like that wherever you slither. I'd prefer not to address you anymore, as you're pretty much a waste of time and energy. Thanks for understanding.
--- End quote ---
I don't think that was an attack. Lashing out in frustration, maybe. It seems that any time anyone has a criticism of Hyde they automatically dismissed as being one of those things I mentioned above. Aside from the tone the point is valid. You just will not engage in any discussion about your beliefs or what you've posted here. I haven't called anyone names, that I recall, although I have been known to do that too sometimes.
Here's a peace offering. Let's start over. Let's be civil and adult and discuss the issues. I apologize for my frustrated and arrogant tone. I seriously would like to know more about this place. From everything I've read, including the supportive things, about Joe Gauld it reminds me of Miller Newton and that interests me very much. I've seen and researched a lot of these places and I haven't come up against one that reminds me of him in quite the way that Gauld does. If I'm wrong I promise, I'll admit it but the things I've seen so far disturb me greatly. Since you seem to have so much faith in him I would honestly like to hear why. Even if I don't agree with you it might give both of us a better understanding of the others point of view. Deal? ::dove::
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""MisfitParent"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Anne Bonney"" ---
--- Quote from: ""MisfitParent"" ---
Alas Bonney, I'm afraid it may be too late for you. If you wish knowledge, seek it at the source, don't ask others to do what you can do better yourself. As for attacks, my comments were not intended as such, but it seems you do have a way of inviting them with the way you lash out at visitors to this site.
--- End quote ---
You seem to have appointed yourself spokesperson, so I was asking. What, can't answer the question? If you've got so much faith in Hyde and what they do for kids, what's the problem with asking some questions about how it works?
Where did I lash out at anyone?
--- End quote ---
In no way did I appoint myself spokesperson, but rather I posted an observation and commentary about Hyde and some posters on this website. I'm not in a postion to answer many of these questions, so therefore they need to be addressed elsewhere. I'm not going to spend my time doing your legwork for you. If you want to know, ask someone at Hyde School. Your initial response to my post is as follows:
Why is it that anyone that has any criticism about Hyde is automatically labeled as "misguided" or "angry" or "disgruntled" or "not working their program" or "immature" or "haven't looked at their own issues" or "disturbed" or......well, you see what I'm getting at.
Do you people ever answer for your own behavior? I also notice that you guys go after the easy targets here. Kids (or grown adults now) are angry. They've got a right to be. Some lash out and get a little outrageous here, I've got no problem with it....I get it. But there are also people here who are asking relevant questions and y'all ignore those and always seem to find the time to address the angry posts. What about answering some of the salient questions and concerns that have been posted?
Sounds like a lash to me. I can understand why people would ask you to go away. You probably get comments like that wherever you slither. I'd prefer not to address you anymore, as you're pretty much a waste of time and energy. Thanks for understanding.
--- End quote ---
Why is do you say "you people" like everyone who supports Hyde is lumped together with one way of thinking? You insult us, but then want to know things from us.
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
Why is do you say "you people" like everyone who supports Hyde is lumped together with one way of thinking? You insult us, but then want to know things from us.
--- End quote ---
You mean the same way that you lumped all "anti-programmies" together?
Are you going to answer any of the questions or just dodge and perry?
Anonymous:
That's parry. Perry was the guy who posted elsewhere that he was willing to have a vigorous debate with you, buth then you drove him off...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version