Author Topic: Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help industry  (Read 1070 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help industry to go unlicensed
By Kirsten Stewart
The Salt Lake Tribune
Article Last Updated: 07/16/2007 06:48:36 AM MDT

Call it the "problem child" of Utah's teen-help industry.
    Majestic Ranch in Randolph - one of four Utah boarding schools that cater to troubled teens - has, until recently, failed to become licensed as required by law. It is the only school to fall short of health and safety benchmarks imposed in October 2005.
    The hang-up: minor changes to an employee handbook, say regulators, who permitted the school to operate without a license for the past 18 months. Regulators say no harm was done; because Majestic is in good standing, they granted the school a probationary license on June 25.
    But the school's slow road to compliance points to a larger problem with Utah's oversight of adoption agencies, wilderness camps, schools and other programs for vulnerable children: a loophole in state law.
    Operating these businesses without a license is a class A misdemeanor - but only if someone is harmed, said Ken Stettler, Human Services licensing director.
    "Usually if it's a new program just coming on, then they simply don't begin operation until they're licensed," said Stettler. "What was uncommon in [Majestic's] case was that we had an existing program that was already operating when the laws went into effect. In this case we don't close them down."
    But at least one new business venture - an adoption agency - slipped through the loophole.
   
Advertisement

Focus on Children, now defunct and facing federal charges of running a baby smuggling operation in Samoa, did business in Utah for 2 1/2 years without a license.
    The agency's owners applied in March 2001, but did not submit all the paperwork. After nudging from regulators, they were licensed on August 1, 2003.
    No one, to Stettler's knowledge, is lobbying to give regulators stronger powers to insist on licensing.
    Utah's Republican-dominated Legislature has traditionally opposed government meddling in the private sector. "Therapeutic" boarding schools, including 21-year-old Majestic Ranch, went unregulated until 2005.
    The law defines "therapeutic schools" as serving students "who have a history of failing to function at home or public school" and that offer room and board.
    Majestic initially fought regulation through its partner World Wide Association of Speciality Programs, a Utah-based chain of get-tough treatment programs.
    Later, after it came to light that Majestic had been investigated three times for abuse, the boarding school became a proponent of regulation. Only one probe ended in a criminal charge and conviction when a staffer - who was eventually fired - pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault.
    Child welfare caseworkers received another complaint of abuse in 2005, but dismissed it as having no merit, said Carol Sisco, Human Services spokeswoman.
    Tammy Johnson, Majestic Ranch director, said the licensing process has helped foster better relations with the state, but it hasn't changed the school's curricula or practices.
    "The only thing that changed is we have to file more paperwork; quite a bit more paperwork," said Johnson.
    Johnson blames some of the licensing delays on regulators who took a year to review Majestic's policies, but stressed, "they've been wonderful to work with."
    Bad press, stemming from "frivolous" complaints from disgruntled employees, have hurt Majestic, said Johnson.
    Over the past two years enrollment has dropped from about 60 students to 32, Johnson said. The school caters to 7-to-14-year-olds; annual tuition costs about $42,000.
    "We lose on average of five kids a month to negative publicity on the Internet. It's unfortunate," said Johnson. "I wouldn't be able to come to work every day if I didn't feel I was making a difference in these families' and students' lives. It's not an easy job."
    World Wide also has suffered. In 2005, there were seven schools in the network. Now there are two, including Majestic Ranch, said World Wide president Ken Kay.
    Kay likens World Wide to a trade or service organization that helps market, handle admissions and purchase classroom materials for boarding schools. But the group also leases buildings to schools. And Majestic owner Dan Peart is related by marriage to World Wide founder Robert Lichfield.
    Still, Kay said Majestic will probably sever ties with World Wide.
    "There's a time for everything. At one point, it was a necessity for a bunch of schools to get together. But as schools grew, they decided they could do everything on their own. I'd be surprised if World Wide lasted more than a year."
http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_6385296
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help industry
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2007, 08:47:50 PM »
Quote
We lose on average of five kids a month to negative publicity on the Internet


::rocker:: O W N A J ::rocker::

And who says Fornits doesn't make a difference?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help indu
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2007, 08:48:22 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Ken Kay: "I'd be surprised if World Wide lasted more than a year."
http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_6385296


Wow, if only that could be true!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help industry
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2007, 09:03:24 PM »
Quote
The school caters to 7-to-14-year-olds; annual tuition costs about $42,000.


Seven year olds? This forum needs to be re-named troubled youth or something. The ages get younger and younger. Maybe soon you can just send your kid to a program at birth and they will raise them completely for you?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help industry
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2007, 01:29:00 AM »
"We lose on average of five kids a month to negative publicity on the Internet"

Kicked back to the top for more love.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help industry
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2007, 12:39:34 PM »
Quote
Operating these businesses without a license is a class A misdemeanor - but only if someone is harmed, said Ken Stettler, Human Services licensing director. "Usually if it's a new program just coming on, then they simply don't begin operation until they're licensed," said Stettler. "What was uncommon in [Majestic's] case was that we had an existing program that was already operating when the laws went into effect. In this case we don't close them down."


How bad does one have to be "hurt"?
Later, after it came to light that Majestic had been investigated three times for abuse, the boarding school became a proponent of regulation. Only one probe ended in a criminal charge and conviction when a staffer - who was eventually fired - pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault.

Let's see what state law says.

62A-2-108.   Licensure requirements -- Expiration -- Renewal.
     (1) Except as provided in Section 62A-2-110, a person, agency, firm, corporation, association, or governmental unit, acting severally or jointly with any other person, agency, firm, corporation, association, or governmental unit, may not establish, conduct, or maintain a human services program in this state without a valid and current license issued by and under the authority of the office as provided by this chapter and the rules of the licensing board.

62A-2-110.   Exclusions from chapter.
     The provisions of this chapter do not apply to:
     (1) a facility or program owned or operated by an agency of the United States government; NO
     (2) a facility or program operated by or under an exclusive contract with the Department of Corrections; NO    
    (3) unless required otherwise by a contract with the department, individual or group counseling by a mental health professional licensed under Title 58, Chapter 60, Mental Health Professional Practice Act; NO
     (4) a general acute hospital, small health care facility, specialty hospital, nursing care facility, or other health care facility licensed by the Department of Health under Title 26, Chapter 21, Health Care Facility Licensing and Inspection Act; NO or
     (5) a boarding school.  Hell NO

62A-2-116.   Violation -- Criminal penalties.
     A person who owns, establishes, conducts, maintains, manages, or operates a human services program in violation of this chapter is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if the violation endangers or harms the health, welfare, or safety of persons participating in that program.

(5) Any licensee that is in operation at the time rules are made in accordance with this chapter shall be given a reasonable time for compliance as determined by the rule.

No definition for "reasonable". Is taking a year to read Majestic Ranch's policies considered "reasonable"?
« Last Edit: July 17, 2007, 02:07:29 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help industry
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2007, 12:56:17 PM »
:flame:  :flame:

Ken Stettler does not have the Testicular Fortitude to run the licensing department of Utah.  He is a waste.  What good is he if he is not going to enforce any laws?  

I am too pissed off to even post.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help industry
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2007, 01:36:11 PM »
Ken Stettler should retire.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline *

  • Posts: 34
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Loophole in state law has allowed some in teen-help industry
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2007, 03:27:43 AM »
Why doesnt the DHS have the power to shut down programs that are not in compliance.  18 months is a ridiculous amount of time.  

I am mortified that it can take months to shut down a program, they CAN run an unlicensed program and only be hit with a misdemenor IF someone is harmed.  If someone dies or the program is shut down they have wait 12 months to open it up in another name.  However, it seems there is loopholes around that as well.  

No wonder so many programs are running out of Utah.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
eople, even more than things, have to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. Remember, if you ever need a helping hand, you will find one at the end of each of your arms.  As you grow older, you will discover that you have two hands; one for helping yourself, and the other for helping others. -Audrey Hepburn