I'm not a leftist. I am basically right wing. Right now I'm reading "The Death of the West" by Pat Buchanan. The reason I brought up "money" was not because we should ban the use of currency, but as a matter of defining the motives of those who oppress. Not all who use money are oppressive I realize.
I was simply seeking to get to the root of the problem which I still believe is that the tyrants who started Straight love money, or else they love power tripping and ego shots.
I am sure that initially Straight seemed like a good idea, something to throw money at and fund to the hilt. Afterall, they were promising parents that they would "save" their children, yea our funky generation, with revoulutionary concepts of "kids helping kids". It's amazing that they didn't get more patents for their cutting edge concepts and formulas.
The fact that it backfired with us doesn't change the fact that parents still don't know what the hell to do with their "troubled" kids and Straight-like programs are more than willing to step in and offer their "answers" for a fee.
It's supply and demand. As long as people believe they need the intervention of militant Straight-like programs, they will foot the bill for them.
Okay, so money serves positive purposes. I agree. How then do we counter those who are willing to capitalize off of parents fears? How do we stop the flow of money to those who abuse humankind because of money?
This is the essence of what I am getting at. I am convinced that Geraldo Rivera, Ralph Nader, Rush Limbaugh, Charles Grodin, Al Sharpton, Bill Clinton, Condaleeza Rice, Ross Perot, Larry King, Walter Cronkite, Vladmir Putin, Saddam Hussein, and Osama Bin Ladin could combine intellectual and clairvoyant powers. In a mighty display of political presence and spiritual power, they could rally the whole world to chant and hum for days on end against Straight-like programs.
Yet there would still be parents that would pay money to get their children the best help that money can buy: Coercive Treatment.
As far as "Rewards ROCK": Will you oppress men for the rewards of money? Is oppression okay because people are seeking "rocking rewards"? We need to have some basic morals (not politics) when it comes to how we view the acquiring of these rewards. I am sure that Mel Sembler agrees that rewards ROCK as he plays air guitar (Led Zepplin-"Nobody's Fault But Mine") on the plane all the way to Italy. ::drummer::
The subject of money is indeed a slippery one, so I will avoid posting about money in the future. We all use money don't we, we probably should avoid money matters on the posts. Afterall, I don't desire to be a splinter in this movement's ASS!