Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools (WWASPS)
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
Joyce Harris:
I have no idea what the relationship is between Scheff and Isabelle at CAICA.
I do know that Scheff was very displeased with the Statement we made to ISAC, because we stated our displeasure with Scheff's/PURE referral to the abusive Whitmore Academy.
Isabelle had published the ISAC Statement on CAICA. I would ASSUME that Sue Scheff was not pleased about having the ISAC Statement published on CAICA.
You would have to ask Isabelle and Sue Scheff if this has anything to do with CAICA not having Whitmore on the CAICA "watchlist" or with Isabelle not supporting the Whitmore parents and children.
Again, I DID NOT request that Isabelle remove Whitmore Academy from her website.
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2006-06-25 21:24:00, Joyce Harris wrote:
"I have no idea what the relationship is between Scheff and Isabelle at CAICA.
I do know that Scheff was very displeased with the Statement we made to ISAC, because we stated our displeasure with Scheff's/PURE referral to the abusive Whitmore Academy.
Isabelle had published the ISAC Statement on CAICA. I would ASSUME that Sue Scheff was not pleased about having the ISAC Statement published on CAICA.
You would have to ask Isabelle and Sue Scheff if this has anything to do with CAICA not having Whitmore on the CAICA "watchlist" or with Isabelle not supporting the Whitmore parents and children.
Again, I DID NOT request that Isabelle remove Whitmore Academy from her website.
"
--- End quote ---
Perhaps Isabelle should revisit this issue? Second thought, why is it even an issue? The state of Utah brought charges against Whitmore.
Doesn't matter how she feels about PURE, she needs to stand behind her personal statement of why she founded CAICA .. something about being the most accurate.
No issue that I can see. There is a trial forthcoming. Other advocacy groups will be monitoring it, I'm sure.
Anonymous:
Izzy's statements should be interesting IF or WHEN Sue Scheff is deposed in EITHER the Whitmore criminal or civil case. Sue Scheff's close connection to each of the children in both cases MAY be of interest to all parties, since she is directly responsible for the enrollment of most, if not ALL the children.
Based on Sue Scheff's depositions in the WWASP vs PURE case, things could get interesting, IF she is deposed in EITHER case. Not saying she will be; but she appears to be a major player.
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2006-06-25 21:43:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Izzy's statements should be interesting IF or WHEN Sue Scheff is deposed in EITHER the Whitmore criminal or civil case. Sue Scheff's close connection to each of the children in both cases MAY be of interest to all parties, since she is directly responsible for the enrollment of most, if not ALL the children.
Based on Sue Scheff's depositions in the WWASP vs PURE case, things could get interesting, IF she is deposed in EITHER case. Not saying she will be; but she appears to be a major player."
--- End quote ---
:eek:
Anonymous:
Scheff's WWASP Deposition is riddled with LIES:
Said she had a degree---LIE
Said she had attorney and psychologists on PURE Staff---well, attorneys/psychologists DID have offices in the SAME building with her! ha!
Said she had experience in the MEDICAL FIELD---she answered the phone at some medical establishment, or some such nonsense.
Can use the "Search WWF" and read it.
So new depositions from this lady could be something else; if Scheff is called to give any depositions.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version