Everyone keeps saying thewho has a kid who killed himself? Is there any truth to this?
Yes, there is. One way you can tell for sure is that as soon as you hit a nerver with The Who he trolls relentlessly to try to shift the focus. In this case he's trying to bury the whole discussion of his dead kid by claiming he and robertBruce are the same person, which they obviously are not.
Bruce is a twenty-something and The Who is a reject child of the '60's. That's right, he couldn't even find acceptance in hippie-dom. when you're rejected even by the hippies (and you're not a narc) you've got
no redeeming qualities.
Anyway, just go back and read The Who's posts and you'll see all of the things he posted about when he was younger that RB would not even have on his radar, much less be able to describe accurately.
The ket here is that as soon as it was revealed that The Who's daughter was actually a son and that the son offed himself,
that's when The Who went to high-power trolling of this thread and now he is so obsessed with 'burying the lead' that all he does, day and night, is post in this thread.
You can see my posts as 'Casual Observer' earlier in the thread. I did my homework and read a lot of the thread and I now seeThe Who lies about everything, especially RB, whom he loves to try to traumatize by bringing up the abuse he suffered at HLA (which RB fought hard to shut down and The Who lobbied to keep it open, BTW).
This 'Casual Observer' learned the truth about The Who and how he shills for the Aspen group.