It must be that you need to be very passive to be a hyde parent.
To be sure, some consideration can be lent to this as well.
But let's consider, for a moment, Hyde's position on parental involvement,
so finely put into words by Joe (color emphasis added):
* ** **** ** *
Since kids--and their parents--have been far more immersed in this counter growth culture than has Hyde, Hyde can be far more objective about how to best address the true growth needs of kids. And given the limited time available, Hyde insists on being the final judge on growth issues. We are in a better position than parents to determine a student's true best, and further we consider our commitment to help each student realize that best a sacred trust.
So--Yes, we may be wrong, and thus we appreciate all the input we can get. However in the end, we urge parents that until graduation to defer to Hyde's judgment, not their own. To instead accept their own judgment becomes a clear statement to their children that the Hyde experience is simply an add-on to old family dynamics, and not a new beginning for the entire family.* ** **** ** *
So... Hyde expects parents to be involved
vis a vis the seminar process, but to defer final judgment to Hyde when it comes to interpretation of such, not to mention all else.
We know little of Hyde's response to the parents' certain alarm in this case. However, given Hyde's response to
other legal circumstances they have found themselves in, it would safe to say that they probably acted in Hyde's own self-serving interests, and not in the best interests of the child. It is likely that their actions may even have been quite
proactive, in an attempt to stave off potential need for litigation.
Were thinly veiled threats insinuated? Were the circumstances significantly downplayed? Was there an attempt to redistribute responsibility? What kind of pressure did Hyde put on the parents?
I think one also needs to consider the fact that the parents in this case were of a different generation than most of the current set of parents, and that questioning the "authority" of Hyde would have carried a heavier psychological onus than we would ordinarily consider justified.
In the end, Hyde's "commitment to help each student realize {their} best" was far less of "a sacred trust" than the student or parents were led to believe. Just about the only thing that appears "sacred" here is preserving the
appearance of the old Blue and Gold.