Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
Scary Larry back on campus!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Was sex consensual? If a 30 year old sells crack to a 17 year old, and the minor does it, is the minor not guilty and punishable by law? Is it different for sex?
--- End quote ---
A 17yo using crack... Did the kid ever use crack before? Is the kid a habitual crack user? Did the kid even want to buy the crack, or was the kid talked into it? Did the kid even know exactly what crack is?
A lot of considerations do factor in, from a moral standpoint, I guess. From a legal standpoint it is much simply, usually. There are different standards for juveniles than for "adults" for good reason.
Is it different for sex? I would say so, personally. You're talking about elements of a person's body that are intrinsically linked to their identity and concept of self-worth. Shattering that generally has more long term repercussions than a few instances of illegal drug experimentation in one's youth does.
--- End quote ---
Then SF is waived of all responsibility. As Joe said, she is simply a maggot unable to transcend animal instincts.
--- End quote ---
She was the best looking maggot I ever saw in Bath Me. God Damn Bob Thurrell. He chased her away. He should burn in hell simply for that.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---Was sex consensual? How do you define "consensual?"
Did the kid ever have sex before? no
Did the kid habitually engage in sex? no
Did the kid even want to have sex? no
...or was the kid talked into it? possibly
Did the kid even know exactly what having sex entails? probably not. I don't think she had even seen a penis in person before.
A lot of considerations do factor in, from a moral standpoint, I guess. From a legal standpoint it is much simpler, usually. There are different standards for juveniles than for "adults" for good reason.
--- End quote ---
We are caught in the horns of a dilemma. We must agree either Ed, or with Joe. Either SF is responsible for her actions (and compromised the school's integrity; Ed's position), or SF is not responsible for her actions (and it is a growth issue for Hyde to handle; Joe's position).
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote --- 17 smokes crack: illegal ever where in the US
17 year old has consensual sex: illegal in some jurisdictions in the US legal in others legal in Me
30 YO has consensual sex with 17 YO: illegal in Me for the 30 YO, legal in Iowa, legal in France
--- End quote ---
Deffine consensual sex. R U saying its ok to rape a student?!!!!
--- End quote ---
rape in not ok
consensual: you say "may I" the other party says "yes you may."
The word on the street was SF was hot and wanted it.
Anonymous:
I recollect Legg refering to a "relationship" in sch mtg. Was this a figure of speech or not?
Ursus:
SF may or may not have been hot, but I sincerely doubt that she "wanted it." Maybe I'm a total prude, but I would imagine that the sheer physical aspects which such an interaction would have entailed would have been overwhelming for someone with no prior "first time," not to mention the fact that he was married.
From what I've learned, SF was also asleep at the time, in an otherwise empty dorm as per arrangement on the part of Bob Thurrell.
Apparently there was an issue of some schoolwork that still needed finishing at the end of the school year. Thurrell made arrangements for her accommodation in the dorm adjacent to his apt.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version