Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
Scary Larry back on campus!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous:
"...given the limited time available, Hyde insists on being the final judge on growth issues. We are in a better position than parents to determine a student's true best..." Joe Gauld 2002
Correct me if I am wrong but wasnt that written after the Dubinsky case even?
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---"...given the limited time available, Hyde insists on being the final judge on growth issues. We are in a better position than parents to determine a student's true best..." Joe Gauld 2002
Correct me if I am wrong but wasnt that written after the Dubinsky case even?
--- End quote ---
Yes. Would you defer to Hyde's judgment if they told you that the sexual harrassment of your child is a growth issue?
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---"...given the limited time available, Hyde insists on being the final judge on growth issues. We are in a better position than parents to determine a student's true best..." Joe Gauld 2002
Correct me if I am wrong but wasnt that written after the Dubinsky case even?
--- End quote ---
You would have to be a pretty shit parent to have this to be true.
"We are in a better position than parents to determine a student's true best"
If that is true you should consider sterilization.
Ursus:
From: "Isn't Hyde Ever Wrong?"
Since society is presently very ignorant about this powerful truth about human growth, the human cocoons we are constructing around our children are sloppy and porous, and often compromise a child's best growth:
* Society does not realize the depth of a child's animal instincts of self-gratification and subjective fears and desires, and thus doesn't fully help the child transcend them;
* Families don't recognize their incredibly interwoven nature and how much family dynamics can compromise a child's best growth;
* Societal and family ignorance have created a huge and powerful youth culture that reaffirms children's animal instincts and resists their human transcendence.Hyde generally deals with kids who have been unusually influenced by those three factors, and, unfortunately, at a late point in their adolescent gestation period. So to counter this, Hyde creates a very intensive growth cocoon focused on character development that seeks to help students: 1) transcend their animal instincts; 2) combat negative family dynamics, and 3) create a new youth culture committed to each student's best.
Since kids--and their parents--have been far more immersed in this counter growth culture than has Hyde, Hyde can be far more objective about how to best address the true growth needs of kids.[/i]
It sounds almost as if he blames the parents, and the kids, but not Hyde... Hyde is too objective to conscientiously allow events like the Thurrell and Dubinsky transgressions to occur. That is really the fault of "a child's animal instincts of self-gratification and subjective fears and desires" along with the failure of parents, perhaps due to ignorance, to curb said animal instincts.
Ursus:
I know it sounds incredible to say this, but I really do think Hyde -- through the lens of Gauld's vision -- assigns blame to the students for what happened to them.
I know that this was clearly the case in the Thurrell incident. They were very angry with SF, far angrier than they were with Thurrell.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version