I don't know about the rest of the posters, but I never took it that Hyde watches this board 24-7 and I doubt this is what the poster meant. The word monitor simply means someone who checks quality or content of something. I do believe Hyde regularly checks this board so in that regard I agree with the person who said they monitor the board.
As far as Hyde believing it is only a select few who are posting, this would only be true if you said that a select few REGULARLY post, but in looking back at all the posts it is obvious there are many former students, current students, former faculty, current parents and former parents who have posted negative comments about their experiences at Hyde. This is not a select few and I think it is time that you admit there are very few success stories at Hyde compared to enrollments. One good example of this is the fact that there were only 29 graduating seniors at Woodstock. What happened to all the seniors? I wish Hyde would take us through the next four years and then tell us about these 29 success stories because when I was there half of the graduating class either didn't go to college or flunked or dropped out by the end of their first year.
I wish Hyde would open up their records to an independent consultant who would record the real stats on Hyde. I believe they are far different from what Hyde says. I don't believe the percentage of students that go to a four year college, I don't believe the credentials listed for the teaching staff, and I don't believe the percentage of acceptances to Hyde. I haven't even been able to get a straight answer as to what kind of degree or degrees the incoming headmaster at Woodstock has attained. You seem to know a lot of inside info, why won't you answer this question?