Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > PURE Bullshit and CAICA

CAICA

<< < (27/30) > >>

Anonymous:
How does one get a copy of the transcripts?  I want to know what the plaintiff presented as evidence and also, who testified and what the nature of their testimony was.  I mean, did the judge cross examine them or what?  Did Scheff take the stand?  Were exhibits offered?  HOW DID THE JUDGE instruct the jurors?  What did he say about the defendant not being present?  These are just a few questions I have.

Are transcripts avaiable for purchase to the public?  I have seen transcripts online before (WWASPS v. PURE) so I am wondering if the transcripts are posted somewhere?

Thanks!

Anonymous:
Yes, most likely the judge and jury did not know why Bock called Scheff a ed con, fraud and what ever else she called her.  

Most likely they, the judge and jury, did not see the testimony that Bock posted here on Fornits and the emails exchanged that showed why she believed Scheff was all of those things she called her.

This whole case has become a marketing ploy for Scheff.  Her paying all the money she paid for this case to go to court, knowing she would probably never be able to collect a dime, really has been money well spent.  Look at all the attention she is getting from it.  Good or bad, it is still attention.

Anonymous:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---How does one get a copy of the transcripts?  I want to know what the plaintiff presented as evidence and also, who testified and what the nature of their testimony was.  I mean, did the judge cross examine them or what?  Did Scheff take the stand?  Were exhibits offered?  HOW DID THE JUDGE instruct the jurors?  What did he say about the defendant not being present?  These are just a few questions I have.

Are transcripts avaiable for purchase to the public?  I have seen transcripts online before (WWASPS v. PURE) so I am wondering if the transcripts are posted somewhere?

Thanks!
--- End quote ---


ISAC?

Anonymous:

--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---Yes, most likely the judge and jury did not know why Bock called Scheff a ed con, fraud and what ever else she called her.  

Most likely they, the judge and jury, did not see the testimony that Bock posted here on Fornits and the emails exchanged that showed why she believed Scheff was all of those things she called her.

This whole case has become a marketing ploy for Scheff.  Her paying all the money she paid for this case to go to court, knowing she would probably never be able to collect a dime, really has been money well spent.  Look at all the attention she is getting from it.  Good or bad, it is still attention.
--- End quote ---


Yup, and let's not forget CAICA seemingly riding the wave of attention too.

 :rofl:

Anonymous:
Wonder why IZZY isn't posting these so-called landmark case  transcripts on CA-CA????

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page