Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools (WWASPS)

CAICA testimonials

<< < (2/4) > >>

Anonymous:
IMO, it wouldn't make the abuses that occur at WWASP any less accurate.  Sue didn't pay the thousands of students and parents who are unhappy with WWASP; she just allegedly paid a few French guys to run around with cameras and film what really goes on.  

If WWASP seeks revenge and funds films about the abusive programs Sue refers to, they could collectively support the cause to End Institutionalized Child Abuse by continuing to one-up each other in their ongoing feud.

Anonymous:
Sue Scheff /Pure does refer to abusive programs, such as Whitmore Academy. And she did refer many children to WWASP facilities.
SO, IF SHE DID FUND the French Documentary, that should come as no big surprise.
No abuse charges were brought against WWASP as a result of WWASP vs PURE, and that is a SHAME.
But, that is not what that case was about in the first place.
WWASP vs PURE did declare that people have the right to speak out against abusive facilities.
Seems Ms. Scheff seems to believe that is her own "private" right. NOT SO!

BuzzKill:
I do a little doubt Susan funded the French documentary. If that were so, I believe I would have heard about it at the time. She would have been bragging about it. As for keeping such a thing secrete - Sue can't keep a secrete.

Its true she was one of the first (if not the first) contact the French made when they began their research and looking for persons of interest. She was the hub the wheel turned on; at least in the beginning. But I never heard anything at all about her funding it, and I feel confident I would have.

There are other people who also helped and provided the French with contacts. Word spread like ripples on a pond - but I believe the first contact was with Sue. I could be wrong - but she was certainly a major source of information. But this does not mean she paid for it. Isn't that what Producers do? Wouldn't she be named in the credits as a producer, if this were so?

I am thinking people are speculating as to why she got such cozy treatment in the film, and this is suspected to be the reason. If so, I think the speculators are wrong.

Remember, this whole thing was done prior to any of the current controversy with Whitmore. I doubt the French have ever heard a whisper about it - and being as they have had such a good repor with her, I doubt they would believe it if they have - just as I as first, didn't believe it.

That Sue and CaCa are back in cahoots seems apparent. How & why might be interesting questions.

Anonymous:
It's obvious Sue Scheff and CA CA are "back in cahoots together."  Wonder why they had a big old falling out before?  Why they "kissed and made up?"
IZZY might should do some homework before she gets too cozy and comfortable.
NAH, they make a good pair.

Anonymous:
Buzzkill, why do you think IZZY is push, push pushing the Sue Scheff P.U.R.E site on CAICA? any insight?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page