Curiously, Mr. Jones and his staff have stated that the Pentagon issue is touchy for the 9/11 truth movement, and so they've remained cautious. Although the evidence of a crash at the Pentagon is loaded with inconsistencies (no pictures of the wreckage, damage too small to be caused by a commercial airliner, and much more), the people at infowars.com believe that it is much harder to prove something did not happen, like an actual plane crash, than something that most likely happened, like the controlled demolition of Building 7. I don't know why they are taking this stance, because the evidence refuting the crash of Flight 77 is overwhelming, and very scientific.
