Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
I lost my virginity at Hyde.
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2006-07-02 11:25:00, Anonymous wrote:
"I only read the first 3 posts and then the last few posts, but all I have to say is, how can you call that sexual abuse? I mean yeah, I'm sorry it was painful and unpleasant, sex shouldn't be like that. My girlfriend and I lost our virginity to each other when we were 16 and it didn't hurt her at all, simply because we were both ready and 100% into it. But that doesn't change the fact that he asked the girl if she wanted to do it, and she consented excitedly, it wasn't until she was on her back on a bathroom floor that she decided she wasn't excited about that anymore. As a guy, it gets very frustrating having to deal with a pendulum like that. One second the girl is all about it, so we're like, hell yea! Let's do this! But then afterwards she decides it wasn't enjoyable to her so suddenly it turns into abuse? Or "taking advantage" of her? Or in some cases, rape? Come on. "
--- End quote ---
You missed the point. It was about how Hyde handled this sensitive incident.
Anonymous:
I'm afraid YOU missed the point... A neurotic teenage girl with low self-esteem (which could apply to about 60% of young teenage girls) voluntarily has sex with a teenage guy who is a jerk (again, about 60%). When asked about it she lies and says nothing, then blabs it around to be cool and gets caught. Two known, proven liars. One denies it, one admits to it. Both are punished equally.
How does this constitute "sexual abuse", "being humiliated by Hyde", "mistreatment" or "mishandling"? Someone's got a twisted agenda here and should get on with their life and stop wallowing in blaming Hyde for their unhappiness. That would be a more direct road to emotional stability...
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2006-07-03 07:23:00, Anonymous wrote:
"I'm afraid YOU missed the point... A neurotic teenage girl with low self-esteem (which could apply to about 60% of young teenage girls) voluntarily has sex with a teenage guy who is a jerk (again, about 60%). When asked about it she lies and says nothing, then blabs it around to be cool and gets caught. Two known, proven liars. One denies it, one admits to it. Both are punished equally.
How does this constitute "sexual abuse", "being humiliated by Hyde", "mistreatment" or "mishandling"? Someone's got a twisted agenda here and should get on with their life and stop wallowing in blaming Hyde for their unhappiness. That would be a more direct road to emotional stability..."
--- End quote ---
So, Hyde had no responsibility to oversee what was going on with 2, 16 year olds on their campus? By your own admission this girl had issues. Hyde's population is mostly kids with issues. Don't you think in an environment like this there should be a PROFESSIONAL on campus to deal with some of these issues?
Anonymous:
Obviously, you're not a parent, as you seem to live in a fantasy world where children are watched 24-7 by a PROFESSIONAL. I don't see where a PROFESSIONAL would have made a difference here. At some point people (including teenagers) need to begin to take responsibility for their lives. That's one of the primary thrusts of Hyde. There will be steps, falls and stumbles along the way, and they can either be a learning experience or one of many stumbles along the road of life. In this case, it was probably one of many stumbles this girl made and will continue to make. But to blame Hyde for it is ludicrous...
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2006-07-04 13:08:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Obviously, you're not a parent, as you seem to live in a fantasy world where children are watched 24-7 by a PROFESSIONAL.
--- End quote ---
B-b-b-b-b-but, isn't that what these parents are PAYING FOR????? Jesus fucking christ!! Make up your minds.
Typical! When the kids do well all the credit goes to Hyde. If they fuck up it's automatically "It ain't OUR fault, you got a fucked up kid". :roll: :roll:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version