Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Aspen Education Group
ASR
Troll Control:
Aww.... Don't cry and change the subject! My credibility isn't an issue, yours and ASR's are! Ha, ha, ha...
You claimed licensed teachers, now back it up! Their names have already been published by ASR (get mad at them for putting it out there, not me!), so just prove what you're saying by linking their license numbers to their names!
I'll be waiting for your proof! Thanks! Ha, ha, ha...
TheWho:
The guest just provided a link to the requirements which shows you dont need a Masters degree to teach in Massachusetts. You were proven wrong, again. You seem to be the one upset.
ASR has licensed teachers, we have called and verified. If you have evidence to the contrary, please provide it.
It appears ASR is in good standing with the state because there are no complaints against them.
These are the facts, there has been no evidence to the contrary.
Troll Control:
AnonWho:
You need a lesson in debate and philosophy. It's never a requirement to prove a negative! I would think someone who claims a college education should know that! Ha, ha, ha...
However, you are unable to provide a shred of evidence to support your claim, other than "I called ASR" :roll: For shame, holding out an alleged call to a non-verifiable source as "proof" - you wouldn't do well in court, sir!
Anyway, as was said before, and as posted above, the rules for licensure are clear and the state maintains the databse of licensed teachers, and none of ASR's teachers are licensed!
Like I said, if you have objectively verifiable evidence, just post it and I'll concede the point. If you really want me to stop saying ASR has only unlicensed teachers on their payroll simply provide their license numbers!
I'll be waiting for your next evasion and be ready to help you refocus! Take your ritilin, finish your morning scotch and post the license numbers! Ha, ha, ha...
TheWho:
--- Quote --- You need a lesson in debate and philosophy. It's never a requirement to prove a negative!
--- End quote ---
Yes it is , If you make the claim.
Let me give you an example: (I have a suspicion who you are and may not understand the logic, but here goes)
Say, you stated that every teacher in the town of Newton Massachusetts were unlicensed. The onus isn’t on me to prove you wrong and do research on every teacher. You will have to back up your claims or abandon them.
The same with ASR. They are a high school in Massachusetts, they give out diplomas like any other high school. If someone feels they have no licensed teachers they need to provide that information. I am not even sure why anyone would make up such a story to begin with. It is unfounded and a smear against the school.
I have provided numbers for the parents to call to verify this, there is no reason to convince each other
Troll Control:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---AnonWho:
You need a lesson in debate and philosophy. It's never a requirement to prove a negative! I would think someone who claims a college education should know that! Ha, ha, ha...
However, you are unable to provide a shred of evidence to support your claim, other than "I called ASR" :roll: For shame, holding out an alleged call to a non-verifiable source as "proof" - you wouldn't do well in court, sir!
Anyway, as was said before, and as posted above, the rules for licensure are clear and the state maintains the databse of licensed teachers, and none of ASR's teachers are licensed!
Like I said, you won't because you [/i]can't[/i]!
Demanding proof of a negative is a logical fallacy. Back to school for you! Ha, ha, ha...
Like I said, if you have objectively verifiable evidence, just post it and I'll concede the point. If you really want me to stop saying ASR has only unlicensed teachers on their payroll simply provide their license numbers!
I'll be waiting for your next evasion and be ready to help you refocus! Take your ritilin, finish your morning scotch and post the license numbers! Ha, ha, ha...
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version