Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Rats are scurrying....
Badpuppy:
I don't get it Mr. Who. Why are you supporting less service for the kids? In the past you have agreed that kids would better served with more and better qualified staff. Your credability as a party interested in the welfare and treatment of young residents is damaged when you proffer the argument that a diminution of vital service is acceptable.[ This Message was edited by: Badpuppy on 2006-05-30 17:15 ]
SHH:
Steve? I typed something here and changed my mind...Let me just say this.....your story is incorrect about the nurse. Check your own posts on here and youll see what Im talking about. YOuve got 2 people mixed up.
[ This Message was edited by: SHH on 2006-05-30 17:55 ]
TheWho:
--- Quote ---On 2006-05-30 17:14:00, Badpuppy wrote:
"I don't get it Mr. Who. Why are you supporting less service for the kids? In the past you have agreed that kids would better served with more and better qualified staff. Your credability as a party interested in the welfare and treatment of young residents is damaged when you proffer the argument that a diminution of vital service is acceptable.[ This Message was edited by: Badpuppy on 2006-05-30 17:15 ]"
--- End quote ---
I do and I believe one should always take the high road. I don?t believe that these schools are in the business to harm children and that they wake up each morning and say ?Lets damage some kids and put their lives in jeopardy?. I believe many of these schools can really help kids and put them back on track. Some places may be misguided and have harmful portions to their programs. But the kids would be better served if we can improve the system, push for oversight and state regulations. Better define the types of kids who would benefit from them and keep others away.
There are many regular posters on fornits who could care less about the kids and are only here for their own personal war against some specific people they use to work with and are using the kids as means to that end.
Why is it so critical to have a dentist on staff? Why is this a major issue, because they care about the kids? I think we both know the real reason. How many other schools have dentists? Are the kids being put in harms way because of this?
When HLA lost their nurse, some people wanted to use this as a means to get parents to remove their kids from HLA and maybe they succeeded in a few but probably not. But did they stop to think about the kids still there? What process was in place for them? Was the receptionist qualified? What does state regulations suggest? What is being done for them? When I brought up these questions I received nothing but resistance and immature baiting, no one cared. Debrorah seemed to care and was able to locate some state requirements and statistics which did support that a nurse was needed to meet states guidelines and also indicated that having a receptionist hand out meds was not all that uncommon. This did not sit too well with those who wanted the school to look bad not help the kids.
I think the kids could end up being the losers from these personal wars. There is so much energy and passion here that if focused in the right way could really do some good for some of these children.
Anyway, just an observation, I?ll step down now.
Anonymous:
Good post, Who. You are right- the outrage on this forum is not about saving kids, but about everyone's personal agenda. Steve (DJ) is pissed at HLA, Deborah is pissed because her kid got sent to HLA against her wishes..... it's all their own little personal battle. If they picked the wrong color paint to paint the front doorway at HLA, DJ would want the place closed down. It's all crap.
Oh-those of you who think Who is a man are nuts. It is a distinctly feminine writing style. That's fine, but this is not a male. Good points, Who.
:silly:
Anonymous:
And you're another sockpuppet. Again.
TheWho has nothing but raw denial to go on, as DJ is owning his ass from here to Nantucket.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version