Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
anonymity on this board
Antigen:
--- Quote ---On 2006-04-13 12:20:00, StephenLong wrote:
Trying to figure out which anonymous said what to the other anonymous makes it difficult to follow the conversation and make sense out of it.
--- End quote ---
Also makes it harder for someont to piece together clues over the long term and ID the author.
May your days be joyously challenging and your words artfully true.
--Ginger Warbis
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
Antigen and Eudora, you've taken a rather entertaining diologue and turned it into an unintelligable babble...
Shut the fuck up!!
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2006-04-14 09:08:00, Eudora wrote:
"
--- Quote ---
On 2006-04-13 12:00:00, Anonymous wrote:
Lars, dude, if Hyde faculty contacted you, former classmate or not, given the context, I see no basis for your presumption of some obligation of privacy, moral or otherwise.
--- End quote ---
Ok, grease to the geese is gravy to the gander, right? So then should Lars call up your mommy and daddy and try and find out why you're being so mean to him in this public forum? What kind of a nut case does shit like that?
One kind. I knew a bunch of people like that over 20 years ago. Fought long and hard to maintain a grip on my sanity till eventually going to court to escape the crazy bastards.
I have never seen the slightest scientific proof of the religious theories of heaven and hell, of future life for individuals, or of a personal God.
--Thomas Edison, American inventor
--- End quote ---
"
--- End quote ---
Lar can call my Mom and Dad. He will need a necromancer to dial for him.
Sue Doenym
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2006-04-14 09:08:00, Eudora wrote:
"
--- Quote ---Ok, grease to the geese is gravy to the gander, right? So then should Lars call up your mommy and daddy and try and find out why you're being so mean to him in this public forum? What kind of a nut case does shit like that?"
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Jeez Eudora, I had kinda hoped you were a little smarter than that, but at this point can only conclude your lack of logic skills makes you the odds on favorite to win the election for village idiot. I will try and help you...
Hyde's relationship with Lars' parents preceded Hyde's relationship with Lars.
Hyde's relationship with Lars' parents is independent of Lars, even if it relates to their mutual concern for him.
Lars has no relationship with my parents whatsoever, let alone was their relationship the way I met Lars, ergo your analogy that somehow I should be ok with Lars calling my family is WHACK.
Let me try a different analogy. Three people are friends for a long time. One day, Friend 1 finds out that Friend 2 is publicly bashing Friend 1. Friend 1 calls Friend 2 to talk about it (to no avail), and the next time Friend 1 and Friend 3 (the person who introduced Friend 1 and Friend 2) talk, it comes up in conversation.
Its really not much more complicated than that....except that Friend 1 and Friend 3 have a business relationship and talk with predictable regularity, making their communication all the more expected, natural and reasonable.
Isn't that more the case here? Anyway, at the end of the day Lars has continued to fail to identify any (moral or otherwise) basis for claiming Hyde does not respect privacy based on the example he cited.
This is the subject which Lars seems to have trouble staying on track on....possibly ADD or something like that....because he just keeps changing the topic. And you, Eudora, without any association or connection with Hyde, you just aid and abet. Wouldn't want one of your faithful followers shown to have made an unsubstantiated allegation, right? (Jeez, dare I say it....but it seems maybe you have created your own cult?)
To me, Lars seems so invested in defending his position on Hyde that even when wrong, he holds on as if his life depended on it. I'm not sure about you, but that tells me a lot about Lars (and his posts).
Sybergal
(Yes, names are good -- I will try and adhere as well....most well run websites I know won't allow anonymous posts and limit users to a single name....otherwise, as stated, its nearly impossible to have a meaningful dialogue, the site devolves to trash-talking garbage posts, and its not a big leap to guess that 99% of the posts are the same three people.)
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2006-04-15 00:35:00, Anonymous wrote:
Jeez Eudora, I had kinda hoped you were a little smarter than that, but at this point can only conclude your lack of logic skills makes you the odds on favorite to win the election for village idiot. I will try and help you...
--- End quote ---
That kind of stuff works well with the Rush and Bill ORielly crowd, but any one with solidly three digit IQ recognizes an ad Hominum attack as a cheap rhetorical technique and the sign of a weak argument. BTW I think Eudora is a very sharp wimmin.
--- Quote ---
Let me try a different analogy. Three people are friends for a long time. One day, Friend 1 finds out that Friend 2 is publicly bashing Friend 1. Friend 1 calls Friend 2 to talk about it (to no avail), and the next time Friend 1 and Friend 3 (the person who introduced Friend 1 and Friend 2) talk, it comes up in conversation.
--- End quote ---
I don't think it was totally wrong. I think it is pretty much like you said. The three have a relationship. With that said, I had a volunteer from Hyde call me a while back. The tentative tone in her voice was plain. I asked her about it. She said some people freak when Hyde calls. So to take Lars point of view let me change your analogy a little:
3 people/groups My parents, my crazy x boy freind, me.
I caught my x with my mothers panties over his head masturbating in the living room. I show him the door. He is a little crazy. He walks the line on the stalking thing for a while then fades away.
I post on a web site for wimmin recoving from crazy men. MY x sees it and call my parents to complain. Since my parents are pretty strait laced I never told them about the pantie fetish. My X is active in our local church as is my parents. My parent call me and ask why I am saying bad things about that nice boy that is active in our church. I am unhappy about the situation. Am I rong? The situation above is ambigious. Hyde does not do grey well. It is like I love Lucy reruns: great in black and white.
--- Quote ---
This is the subject which Lars seems to have trouble staying on track on....possibly ADD or something like that
--- End quote ---
I don't think it is ADD. Since Lars confessed to choosing his college based on soft core porn, my guess it he has some internet porn open in another browser window and it is distracting him. He is typing with one hand if you know what I mean.
--- Quote ---
Sybergal
(Yes, names are good -- I will try and adhere as well....most well run websites I know won't allow anonymous posts and limit users to a single name....otherwise, as stated, its nearly impossible to have a meaningful dialogue, the site devolves to trash-talking garbage posts, and its not a big leap to guess that 99% of the posts are the same three people.)"
--- End quote ---
I suspect that "that 99% of the posts are the same three people" and when you pose a question that is hard for them to answer they stop posting. Since Hyde ,unlike other private secondary schools, does not have an IQ bogie to gain admission, some of the folks that attended are not the brightest bulbs in the knife draw.
Sue Doenym
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version